PKW vs. RDIV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PKW (Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF) and RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds from Invesco - PKW tracks the NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index while RDIV tracks the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PKW returned 12.81%/yr vs 10.95%/yr for RDIV. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PKW charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RDIV.

Performance

PKW vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKW achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than RDIV's 11.95% return. Over the past 10 years, PKW has outperformed RDIV with an annualized return of 12.81%, while RDIV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.95% annualized return.

PKW

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 2.43%
• 6M: 3.41%
• 1Y: 16.01%
• 3Y*: 18.60%
• 5Y*: 9.90%
• 10Y*: 12.81%

RDIV

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 2.29%
• YTD: 11.95%
• 6M: 11.03%
• 1Y: 27.04%
• 3Y*: 19.26%
• 5Y*: 10.04%
• 10Y*: 10.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKW vs. RDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PKW Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF	2.43%	17.92%	17.33%	17.24%	-10.21%	32.62%	8.41%	34.09%	-10.53%	17.75%
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF	11.95%	12.36%	15.17%	4.66%	7.16%	29.12%	-9.31%	22.62%	-4.78%	11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between PKW and RDIV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2013	0.78

The correlation between PKW and RDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PKW vs. RDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PKW	RDIV
Financial Services	29.4%	18.0%
Consumer Cyclical	19.1%	9.5%
Industrials	14.2%	-
Technology	10.8%	5.1%
Healthcare	10.1%	7.8%
Energy	5.6%	28.8%
Communication Services	4.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	15.9%
Utilities	2.1%	6.4%
Basic Materials	1.1%	0.5%
Real Estate	0.3%	8.0%

Return for Risk

PKW vs. RDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKW

PKW Risk / Return Rank: 36
PKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
PKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
PKW Omega Ratio Rank: 31
PKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
PKW Martin Ratio Rank: 40

RDIV

RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 71
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKW vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PKW	RDIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	2.06	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	3.07	-1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.36	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	5.61	-3.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.46	16.50	-10.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PKW vs. RDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKW Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the RDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKW and RDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PKW	RDIV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	2.06	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.58	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	0.50	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.55	-0.03

Drawdowns

PKW vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKW drawdown since its inception was -54.59%, which is greater than RDIV's maximum drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKW and RDIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	PKW	RDIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.59%	-49.97%	-4.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.86%	-4.84%	-3.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.91%	-17.91%	-3.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.51%	-24.89%	+1.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.93%	-49.97%	+9.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.15%	-1.65%	-0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.96%	-5.86%	-2.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	1.65%	+0.84%

Volatility

PKW vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) is 3.18%, while Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that PKW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PKW	RDIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.18%	3.46%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.39%	8.62%	+0.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.14%	13.23%	-0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.45%	17.53%	-0.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.78%	21.89%	-2.11%

PKW vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PKW has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than RDIV's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

PKW vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison

PKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than RDIV's 3.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PKW Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF	0.90%	0.99%	0.86%	1.17%	1.22%	0.72%	1.48%	1.30%	1.30%	0.65%	1.59%	1.14%
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF	3.66%	3.94%	4.08%	3.93%	3.44%	3.31%	4.93%	3.84%	4.32%	4.26%	2.20%	4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PKW and RDIV in my portfolio?

PKW and RDIV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PKW or RDIV?

RDIV has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to PKW (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKW dropped -54.59% vs RDIV's -49.97%.

Which ETF is better, PKW or RDIV?

On 10-year performance, PKW leads with 12.81% vs 10.95% for RDIV. On fees, RDIV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, PKW has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PKW or RDIV?

Over the 10-year period, PKW has performed better with a 12.81% return vs 10.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PKW or RDIV?

RDIV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PKW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PKW or RDIV?

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 0.90% for PKW.

What is the main difference between PKW and RDIV?

PKW tracks NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index, while RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PKW and 0.39% for RDIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.