PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PKW vs. IWB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PKW vs. IWB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKW achieves a 8.30% return, which is significantly lower than IWB's 10.52% return. Over the past 10 years, PKW has underperformed IWB with an annualized return of 13.25%, while IWB has yielded a comparatively higher 14.80% annualized return.


PKW

1D
0.99%
1M
3.43%
6M
5.37%
YTD
8.30%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
17.74%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
13.25%

IWB

1D
-0.45%
1M
0.41%
6M
8.70%
YTD
10.52%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
19.65%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
14.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKW vs. IWB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
8.30%17.92%17.33%17.24%-10.21%32.62%8.41%34.09%-10.53%17.75%
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
10.52%17.18%24.32%26.39%-19.19%26.32%20.77%31.06%-4.90%21.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PKW and IWB is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2006

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between PKW and IWB has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PKW vs. IWB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PKW
IWB

Financial Services

28.4%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

19.0%
10.0%

Industrials

14.0%
8.7%

Technology

12.3%
37.3%

Healthcare

10.2%
8.5%

Energy

5.4%
3.2%

Communication Services

4.1%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
4.4%

Utilities

2.2%
2.1%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.9%

Real Estate

0.3%
2.1%

Financial Services

PKW
28.4%
IWB
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PKW
19.0%
IWB
10.0%

Industrials

PKW
14.0%
IWB
8.7%

Technology

PKW
12.3%
IWB
37.3%

Healthcare

PKW
10.2%
IWB
8.5%

Energy

PKW
5.4%
IWB
3.2%

Communication Services

PKW
4.1%
IWB
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

PKW
3.2%
IWB
4.4%

Utilities

PKW
2.2%
IWB
2.1%

Basic Materials

PKW
1.0%
IWB
1.9%

Real Estate

PKW
0.3%
IWB
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PKW vs. IWB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKW
PKW Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PKW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKW Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PKW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKW Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

IWB
IWB Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWB Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWB Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKW vs. IWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PKWIWBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.30

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

2.38

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.10

10.35

-3.25

PKW vs. IWB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKW Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the IWB Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKW and IWB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PKW vs. IWB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKW drawdown since its inception was -54.59%, roughly equal to the maximum IWB drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKW and IWB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKWIWBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.59%

-55.38%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-8.86%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

-19.09%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.51%

-25.20%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.93%

-34.60%

-6.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.73%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.92%

-10.82%

+2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.03%

+0.46%

Volatility

PKW vs. IWB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF (PKW) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) have volatilities of 3.38% and 3.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKWIWBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

3.38%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.64%

9.99%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.20%

12.59%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

17.21%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.69%

18.12%

+1.57%

PKW vs. IWB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PKW has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than IWB's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PKW vs. IWB - Dividend Comparison

PKW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than IWB's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
0.92%1.00%1.14%1.31%1.56%1.09%1.37%1.71%2.06%1.64%1.89%1.95%
PKW
Invesco BuyBack Achievers™ ETF
0.78%0.99%0.86%1.17%1.22%0.72%1.48%1.30%1.30%0.65%1.59%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


PKW and IWB have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWB has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to PKW (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKW dropped -54.59% vs IWB's -55.38%.

On 10-year performance, IWB leads with 14.80% vs 13.25% for PKW. On fees, IWB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWB has performed better with a 14.80% return vs 13.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PKW.

IWB has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.78% for PKW.

PKW is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while IWB is Large Cap Blend Equities. PKW tracks NASDAQ US BuyBack Achievers Index, while IWB tracks Russell 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PKW and 0.15% for IWB.

IWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PKW and IWB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer