PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PKB vs. XLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PKB vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKB achieves a 16.22% return, which is significantly higher than XLP's 10.66% return. Over the past 10 years, PKB has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 15.86%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.58% annualized return.


PKB

1D
1.66%
1M
5.36%
YTD
16.22%
6M
11.91%
1Y
39.97%
3Y*
28.24%
5Y*
17.52%
10Y*
15.86%

XLP

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.99%
YTD
10.66%
6M
8.80%
1Y
8.50%
3Y*
7.50%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
7.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKB vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PKB
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF
16.22%22.47%20.24%55.29%-24.88%32.96%24.49%40.15%-31.11%24.67%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
10.66%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%-8.07%12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between PKB and XLP is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2005

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between PKB and XLP has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PKB vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PKB
XLP

Industrials

41.7%

-

Basic Materials

36.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

19.4%
1.0%

Utilities

3.0%

-

Energy

2.4%

-

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

99.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Industrials

PKB
41.7%
XLP

-

Basic Materials

PKB
36.5%
XLP

-

Consumer Cyclical

PKB
19.4%
XLP
1.0%

Utilities

PKB
3.0%
XLP

-

Energy

PKB
2.4%
XLP

-

Financial Services

PKB
0.1%
XLP

-

Communication Services

PKB

-

XLP

-

Consumer Defensive

PKB

-

XLP
99.0%

Healthcare

PKB

-

XLP

-

Real Estate

PKB

-

XLP

-

Technology

PKB

-

XLP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PKB vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKB
PKB Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PKB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKB Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PKB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKB Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKB vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PKBXLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.12

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

0.88

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.26

1.70

+6.56

PKB vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKB Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKB and XLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PKB vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKB drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKB and XLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKBXLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.21%

-35.90%

-29.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.41%

-9.69%

-5.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.75%

-12.39%

-17.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.85%

-16.30%

-18.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.29%

-24.51%

-27.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-4.50%

+1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.75%

-7.06%

-8.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.85%

5.02%

-0.17%

Volatility

PKB vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) has a higher volatility of 8.82% compared to State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) at 4.55%. This indicates that PKB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKBXLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.82%

4.55%

+4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.70%

10.13%

+8.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.78%

12.85%

+10.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.79%

13.34%

+12.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.30%

14.75%

+12.55%

PKB vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PKB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

PKB vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

PKB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than XLP's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PKB
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF
0.14%0.14%0.23%0.33%0.43%0.25%0.30%0.37%0.54%0.17%0.31%0.11%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


PKB and XLP have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PKB has higher volatility (8.82%) compared to XLP (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKB dropped -65.21% vs XLP's -35.90%.

On 10-year performance, PKB leads with 15.86% vs 7.58% for XLP. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PKB has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 7.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PKB.

XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.14% for PKB.

PKB is categorized as Building & Construction, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PKB and 0.08% for XLP.

PKB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PKB and XLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer