PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PKB vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PKB vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKB achieves a 12.44% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 71.80% return. Over the past 10 years, PKB has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of 14.71%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.78% annualized return.


PKB

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.65%
6M
5.14%
YTD
12.44%
1Y
25.52%
3Y*
24.69%
5Y*
16.46%
10Y*
14.71%

UGA

1D
-1.13%
1M
0.87%
6M
65.75%
YTD
71.80%
1Y
66.14%
3Y*
17.96%
5Y*
23.72%
10Y*
15.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKB vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PKB
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF
12.44%22.47%20.24%55.29%-24.88%32.96%24.49%40.15%-31.11%24.67%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
71.80%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%-24.88%41.25%-28.07%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between PKB and UGA is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2008

0.21

The correlation between PKB and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PKB vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKB
PKB Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PKB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKB Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
PKB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKB Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKB vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PKBUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.32

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

3.41

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.99

9.53

-4.55

PKB vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKB Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKB and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PKB vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKB drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKB and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKBUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.21%

-86.59%

+21.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.41%

-20.32%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.75%

-26.68%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.85%

-38.11%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.29%

-75.89%

+23.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.77%

-14.20%

+5.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.71%

-36.64%

+20.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

7.26%

-2.24%

Volatility

PKB vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) is 9.48%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 10.45%. This indicates that PKB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKBUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.48%

10.45%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.30%

31.50%

-12.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.46%

35.39%

-10.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.89%

34.57%

-8.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.31%

37.20%

-9.89%

PKB vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PKB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PKB vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

PKB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PKB
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF
0.19%0.14%0.23%0.33%0.43%0.25%0.30%0.37%0.54%0.17%0.31%0.11%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PKB and UGA have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to PKB (9.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKB dropped -65.21% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 15.78% vs 14.71% for PKB. On fees, PKB is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PKB has been the lower-risk option at 9.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 15.78% return vs 14.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PKB is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

PKB has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

PKB is categorized as Building & Construction, while UGA is Oil & Gas. PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PKB and 0.75% for UGA.

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PKB and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer