PKB vs. AIPO
PKB (Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PKB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while AIPO is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PKB returned 18.46% vs 42.03% for AIPO. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PKB charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.
Performance
PKB vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PKB achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 29.43% return.
PKB
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -6.80%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 1Y
- 18.46%
- 3Y*
- 21.46%
- 5Y*
- 14.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.05%
AIPO
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -7.73%
- 6M
- 16.62%
- YTD
- 29.43%
- 1Y
- 42.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 40.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $40.86M | $38.41M | $47.30M | |
| $846.36K | $1.43M | $1.62M |
PKB vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 8.46% | 9.20% |
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 29.43% | 9.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between PKB and AIPO is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.68 |
The correlation between PKB and AIPO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
PKB vs. AIPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PKB
AIPO
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Energy
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Industrials
PKB
AIPO
Basic Materials
PKB
AIPO
-
Consumer Cyclical
PKB
AIPO
Utilities
PKB
AIPO
Energy
PKB
AIPO
Financial Services
PKB
AIPO
Communication Services
PKB
-
AIPO
Consumer Defensive
PKB
-
AIPO
-
Healthcare
PKB
-
AIPO
-
Real Estate
PKB
-
AIPO
Technology
PKB
-
AIPO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PKB vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank
PKB
AIPO
PKB vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PKB | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.19 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 1.61 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.15 | 5.40 | -2.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PKB vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PKB drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -24.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKB and AIPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PKB | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.21% | -24.36% | -40.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.41% | -24.36% | +8.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.00% | -17.66% | +5.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.70% | -5.28% | -10.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.65% | 7.27% | -1.62% |
Volatility
PKB vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) is 7.31%, while Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) has a volatility of 14.51%. This indicates that PKB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PKB | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | 14.51% | -7.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.52% | 29.84% | -10.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.85% | 37.46% | -12.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 37.20% | -11.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.37% | 37.20% | -9.83% |
PKB vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PKB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
PKB vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison
PKB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 0.19% | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PKB and AIPO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIPO has higher volatility (14.51%) compared to PKB (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKB dropped -65.21% vs AIPO's -24.36%.
On 1-year performance, AIPO leads with 42.03% vs 18.46% for PKB. On fees, PKB is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PKB has been the lower-risk option at 7.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AIPO has performed better with a 42.03% return vs 18.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PKB is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.
PKB has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.
PKB is categorized as Building & Construction, while AIPO is Artificial Intelligence. PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PKB and 0.69% for AIPO.
AIPO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PKB and AIPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer