PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJP vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJP vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJP achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 15.48% return. Over the past 10 years, PJP has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 6.15%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.


PJP

1D
1.20%
1M
1.29%
YTD
2.90%
6M
2.29%
1Y
34.73%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
6.15%

SPHQ

1D
0.28%
1M
7.17%
YTD
15.48%
6M
16.06%
1Y
23.22%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJP vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PJP
Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF
2.90%27.98%9.63%-2.18%-2.16%14.58%11.29%4.64%-1.78%15.30%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
15.48%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PJP and SPHQ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2005

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between PJP and SPHQ has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PJP vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PJP
SPHQ

Healthcare

100.0%
8.4%

Basic Materials

-

2.2%

Communication Services

-

2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

15.4%

Energy

-

0.7%

Financial Services

-

13.3%

Industrials

-

24.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

28.1%

Utilities

-

1.0%

Healthcare

PJP
100.0%
SPHQ
8.4%

Basic Materials

PJP

-

SPHQ
2.2%

Communication Services

PJP

-

SPHQ
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PJP

-

SPHQ
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

PJP

-

SPHQ
15.4%

Energy

PJP

-

SPHQ
0.7%

Financial Services

PJP

-

SPHQ
13.3%

Industrials

PJP

-

SPHQ
24.3%

Real Estate

PJP

-

SPHQ

-

Technology

PJP

-

SPHQ
28.1%

Utilities

PJP

-

SPHQ
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJP vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJP
PJP Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJP Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJP Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJP vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJPSPHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.32

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

2.62

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.55

11.17

+0.38

PJP vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJP Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJP and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJPSPHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.85

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.89

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.84

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.53

+0.06

Drawdowns

PJP vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJP drawdown since its inception was -37.06%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJP and SPHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJPSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.06%

-57.83%

+20.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-8.90%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-16.57%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.51%

-25.04%

+7.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.95%

-31.60%

-2.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.94%

0.00%

-2.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.85%

-10.70%

+1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.08%

+0.94%

Volatility

PJP vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 3.49%. This indicates that PJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJPSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

3.49%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

10.18%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.38%

12.62%

+3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

16.45%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

17.86%

+0.53%

PJP vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJP vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

PJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than SPHQ's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PJP
Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF
0.99%0.98%0.97%1.01%0.95%0.81%0.75%0.77%1.12%0.65%0.91%5.49%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.04%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


PJP and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PJP has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to SPHQ (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJP dropped -37.06% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.01% vs 6.15% for PJP. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.01% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PJP.

SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.99% for PJP.

PJP is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PJP and 0.15% for SPHQ.

PJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJP and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer