PJP vs. IBB
PJP (Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF) and IBB (iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - PJP tracks the Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index while IBB tracks the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PJP returned 7.25%/yr vs 8.14%/yr for IBB. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PJP charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBB.
Performance
PJP vs. IBB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJP achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly higher than IBB's 4.97% return. Over the past 10 years, PJP has underperformed IBB with an annualized return of 7.25%, while IBB has yielded a comparatively higher 8.14% annualized return.
PJP
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 7.87%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- 1Y
- 42.28%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- 7.25%
IBB
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- YTD
- 4.97%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 41.38%
- 3Y*
- 11.58%
- 5Y*
- 2.25%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
PJP vs. IBB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 7.87% | 27.98% | 9.63% | -2.18% | -2.16% | 14.58% | 11.29% | 4.64% | -1.78% | 15.30% |
IBB iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 4.97% | 27.98% | -2.41% | 3.76% | -13.69% | 0.95% | 26.01% | 25.42% | -9.53% | 21.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJP and IBB is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005 | 0.83 |
The correlation between PJP and IBB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
PJP vs. IBB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PJP
IBB
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
PJP
IBB
Financial Services
PJP
IBB
-
Basic Materials
PJP
-
IBB
-
Communication Services
PJP
-
IBB
-
Consumer Cyclical
PJP
-
IBB
-
Consumer Defensive
PJP
-
IBB
-
Energy
PJP
-
IBB
-
Industrials
PJP
-
IBB
-
Real Estate
PJP
-
IBB
-
Technology
PJP
-
IBB
-
Utilities
PJP
-
IBB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJP vs. IBB — Risk / Return Rank
PJP
IBB
PJP vs. IBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PJP | IBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.34 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.50 | 4.32 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.26 | 13.28 | +0.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PJP vs. IBB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJP drawdown since its inception was -37.06%, smaller than the maximum IBB drawdown of -62.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJP and IBB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJP | IBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.06% | -62.85% | +25.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -9.63% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.27% | -24.85% | +8.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.51% | -39.82% | +22.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.95% | -39.82% | +5.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.26% | -0.27% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.83% | -21.15% | +12.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 3.12% | -0.15% |
Volatility
PJP vs. IBB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) is 5.20%, while iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that PJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJP | IBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 6.96% | -1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.34% | 15.99% | -3.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.54% | 20.37% | -3.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 22.03% | -5.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 23.22% | -4.83% |
PJP vs. IBB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IBB's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJP vs. IBB - Dividend Comparison
PJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than IBB's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBB iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.29% | 0.26% | 0.31% | 0.21% | 0.21% | 0.33% | 0.20% | 0.30% | 0.19% | 0.03% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 1.19% | 0.98% | 0.97% | 1.01% | 0.95% | 0.81% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.12% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 5.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PJP and IBB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBB has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to PJP (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJP dropped -37.06% vs IBB's -62.85%.
On 10-year performance, IBB leads with 8.14% vs 7.25% for PJP. On fees, IBB is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, PJP has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IBB has performed better with a 8.14% return vs 7.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBB is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PJP.
PJP has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.23% for IBB.
PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while IBB tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PJP and 0.47% for IBB.
PJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJP and IBB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer