PJP vs. PBE

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

PJP (Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF) and PBE (Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from Invesco - PJP tracks the Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index while PBE tracks the Dynamic Biotech & Genome Intellidex Index (AMEX). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PJP returned 6.97%/yr vs 8.19%/yr for PBE. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PJP charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PBE.

Performance

PJP vs. PBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJP achieves a 16.81% return, which is significantly higher than PBE's 10.26% return. Over the past 10 years, PJP has underperformed PBE with an annualized return of 6.97%, while PBE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.19% annualized return.

PJP

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: 0.44%
• 6M: 16.01%
• YTD: 16.81%
• 1Y: 48.98%
• 3Y*: 17.41%
• 5Y*: 9.51%
• 10Y*: 6.97%
• ALL TIME*: 11.74%

PBE

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -2.64%
• 6M: 10.64%
• YTD: 10.26%
• 1Y: 39.36%
• 3Y*: 13.77%
• 5Y*: 3.98%
• 10Y*: 8.19%
• ALL TIME*: 9.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PBE Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF	$494.21K	$657.50K	$547.45K
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF	$5.48M	$7.14M	$3.39M

PJP vs. PBE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF	16.81%	27.98%	9.63%	-2.18%	-2.16%	14.58%	11.29%	4.64%	-1.78%	15.30%
PBE Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF	10.26%	24.84%	1.10%	3.71%	-10.83%	1.54%	25.66%	18.65%	-0.19%	22.28%

Correlation

The correlation between PJP and PBE is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005	0.80

The correlation between PJP and PBE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

PJP vs. PBE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PJP	PBE
Healthcare	100.0%	100.0%
Financial Services	0.0%	0.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PJP vs. PBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PJP

PJP Risk / Return Rank: 95
PJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
PJP Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PJP Martin Ratio Rank: 93

PBE

PBE Risk / Return Rank: 85
PBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
PBE Omega Ratio Rank: 84
PBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PBE Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PJP vs. PBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PJP	PBE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.10	2.13	+0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.35	3.12	+1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.36	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.53	3.42	+2.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.34	9.57	+7.77

PJP vs. PBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJP Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the PBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJP and PBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PJP vs. PBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJP drawdown since its inception was -37.06%, smaller than the maximum PBE drawdown of -45.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJP and PBE.

Drawdown Indicators

	PJP	PBE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.06%	-45.69%	+8.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.44%	-11.73%	+2.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.27%	-22.43%	+6.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.51%	-34.71%	+17.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.95%	-37.84%	+3.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.10%	-3.83%	+2.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.79%	-16.13%	+7.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	4.18%	-1.17%

Volatility

PJP vs. PBE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE) at 5.60%. This indicates that PJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PJP	PBE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.97%	5.60%	+0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.25%	13.56%	-0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.00%	18.83%	-1.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.37%	22.50%	-6.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.38%	24.73%	-6.35%

PJP vs. PBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than PBE's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

PJP vs. PBE - Dividend Comparison

PJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than PBE's 1.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBE Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF	1.73%	1.00%	0.05%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.57%	0.38%	1.12%
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF	0.88%	0.98%	0.97%	1.01%	0.95%	0.81%	0.75%	0.77%	1.12%	0.65%	0.91%	5.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PJP and PBE in my portfolio?

PJP and PBE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PJP or PBE?

PJP has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to PBE (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJP dropped -37.06% vs PBE's -45.69%.

Which ETF is better, PJP or PBE?

On 10-year performance, PBE leads with 8.19% vs 6.97% for PJP. On fees, PJP is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PBE has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PJP or PBE?

Over the 10-year period, PBE has performed better with a 8.19% return vs 6.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PJP or PBE?

PJP is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PBE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PJP or PBE?

PBE has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.88% for PJP.

What is the main difference between PJP and PBE?

PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while PBE tracks Dynamic Biotech & Genome Intellidex Index (AMEX). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PJP and 0.59% for PBE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.