PJP vs. PBE
PJP (Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF) and PBE (Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from Invesco - PJP tracks the Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index while PBE tracks the Dynamic Biotech & Genome Intellidex Index (AMEX). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PJP returned 7.25%/yr vs 9.35%/yr for PBE. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PJP charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PBE.
Performance
PJP vs. PBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJP achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly higher than PBE's 4.26% return. Over the past 10 years, PJP has underperformed PBE with an annualized return of 7.25%, while PBE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.35% annualized return.
PJP
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 7.87%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- 1Y
- 42.28%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- 7.25%
PBE
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- YTD
- 4.26%
- 6M
- 2.94%
- 1Y
- 35.92%
- 3Y*
- 12.04%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
PJP vs. PBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 7.87% | 27.98% | 9.63% | -2.18% | -2.16% | 14.58% | 11.29% | 4.64% | -1.78% | 15.30% |
PBE Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF | 4.26% | 24.84% | 1.10% | 3.71% | -10.83% | 1.54% | 25.66% | 18.65% | -0.19% | 22.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJP and PBE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005 | 0.80 |
The correlation between PJP and PBE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
PJP vs. PBE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PJP
PBE
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
PJP
PBE
Financial Services
PJP
PBE
Basic Materials
PJP
-
PBE
-
Communication Services
PJP
-
PBE
-
Consumer Cyclical
PJP
-
PBE
-
Consumer Defensive
PJP
-
PBE
-
Energy
PJP
-
PBE
-
Industrials
PJP
-
PBE
-
Real Estate
PJP
-
PBE
-
Technology
PJP
-
PBE
-
Utilities
PJP
-
PBE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJP vs. PBE — Risk / Return Rank
PJP
PBE
PJP vs. PBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PJP | PBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.32 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.50 | 3.08 | +1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.26 | 8.64 | +5.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PJP vs. PBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJP drawdown since its inception was -37.06%, smaller than the maximum PBE drawdown of -45.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJP and PBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJP | PBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.06% | -45.69% | +8.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -11.73% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.27% | -22.43% | +6.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.51% | -34.71% | +17.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.95% | -37.84% | +3.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.26% | -0.10% | -1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.83% | -16.20% | +7.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 4.17% | -1.20% |
Volatility
PJP vs. PBE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) is 5.20%, while Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF (PBE) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that PJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJP | PBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | 5.59% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.34% | 13.68% | -1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.54% | 19.00% | -2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 22.49% | -6.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 24.88% | -6.49% |
PJP vs. PBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than PBE's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJP vs. PBE - Dividend Comparison
PJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than PBE's 1.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBE Invesco Dynamic Biotechnology & Genome ETF | 1.98% | 1.00% | 0.05% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.57% | 0.38% | 1.12% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 1.19% | 0.98% | 0.97% | 1.01% | 0.95% | 0.81% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.12% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 5.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PJP and PBE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBE has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to PJP (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJP dropped -37.06% vs PBE's -45.69%.
On 10-year performance, PBE leads with 9.35% vs 7.25% for PJP. On fees, PJP is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PJP has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PBE has performed better with a 9.35% return vs 7.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PJP is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PBE.
PBE has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 1.19% for PJP.
PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while PBE tracks Dynamic Biotech & Genome Intellidex Index (AMEX). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PJP and 0.59% for PBE.
PJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJP and PBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer