PJP vs. IAK
PJP (Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF) and IAK (iShares U.S. Insurance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PJP is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while IAK is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PJP returned 7.06%/yr vs 13.33%/yr for IAK. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PJP charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IAK.
Performance
PJP vs. IAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJP achieves a 15.78% return, which is significantly higher than IAK's 10.81% return. Over the past 10 years, PJP has underperformed IAK with an annualized return of 7.06%, while IAK has yielded a comparatively higher 13.33% annualized return.
PJP
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- 6M
- 15.29%
- YTD
- 15.78%
- 1Y
- 43.85%
- 3Y*
- 17.08%
- 5Y*
- 9.28%
- 10Y*
- 7.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.71%
IAK
- 1D
- 2.11%
- 1M
- 7.61%
- 6M
- 16.12%
- YTD
- 10.81%
- 1Y
- 17.49%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 16.26%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $21.27M | $20.97M | $10.82M | |
| $11.91M | $6.38M | $3.32M |
PJP vs. IAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 15.78% | 27.98% | 9.63% | -2.18% | -2.16% | 14.58% | 11.29% | 4.64% | -1.78% | 15.30% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 10.81% | 9.50% | 28.25% | 11.28% | 11.33% | 26.84% | -2.86% | 25.94% | -11.48% | 14.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJP and IAK is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PJP and IAK has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PJP vs. IAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PJP
IAK
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
PJP
IAK
Financial Services
PJP
IAK
Basic Materials
PJP
-
IAK
-
Communication Services
PJP
-
IAK
-
Consumer Cyclical
PJP
-
IAK
-
Consumer Defensive
PJP
-
IAK
-
Energy
PJP
-
IAK
-
Industrials
PJP
-
IAK
-
Real Estate
PJP
-
IAK
-
Technology
PJP
-
IAK
-
Utilities
PJP
-
IAK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJP vs. IAK — Risk / Return Rank
PJP
IAK
PJP vs. IAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PJP | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.21 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.71 | 2.41 | +2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.61 | 5.86 | +8.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PJP vs. IAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJP drawdown since its inception was -37.06%, smaller than the maximum IAK drawdown of -77.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJP and IAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJP | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.06% | -77.38% | +40.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -7.62% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.27% | -11.58% | -4.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.51% | -14.76% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.95% | -44.95% | +11.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | 0.00% | -1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.80% | -16.03% | +7.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 3.13% | -0.10% |
Volatility
PJP vs. IAK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) is 6.18%, while iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that PJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJP | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 7.15% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.23% | 12.11% | +1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.97% | 15.87% | +1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 18.09% | -1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 20.90% | -2.52% |
PJP vs. IAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IAK's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJP vs. IAK - Dividend Comparison
PJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than IAK's 2.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 2.41% | 1.69% | 1.49% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 2.26% | 2.07% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.62% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.88% | 0.98% | 0.97% | 1.01% | 0.95% | 0.81% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.12% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 5.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PJP and IAK have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAK has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to PJP (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJP dropped -37.06% vs IAK's -77.38%.
On 10-year performance, IAK leads with 13.33% vs 7.06% for PJP. On fees, IAK is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, PJP has been the lower-risk option at 6.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IAK has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAK is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PJP.
IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.88% for PJP.
PJP is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IAK is Financials Equities. PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PJP and 0.38% for IAK.
PJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJP and IAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer