PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJP vs. IAK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJP vs. IAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJP achieves a 15.78% return, which is significantly higher than IAK's 10.81% return. Over the past 10 years, PJP has underperformed IAK with an annualized return of 7.06%, while IAK has yielded a comparatively higher 13.33% annualized return.


PJP

1D
0.14%
1M
4.06%
6M
15.29%
YTD
15.78%
1Y
43.85%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*
7.06%
ALL TIME*
11.71%

IAK

1D
2.11%
1M
7.61%
6M
16.12%
YTD
10.81%
1Y
17.49%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
16.26%
10Y*
13.33%
ALL TIME*
7.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$21.27M$20.97M$10.82M
$11.91M$6.38M$3.32M

PJP vs. IAK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PJP
Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF
15.78%27.98%9.63%-2.18%-2.16%14.58%11.29%4.64%-1.78%15.30%
IAK
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF
10.81%9.50%28.25%11.28%11.33%26.84%-2.86%25.94%-11.48%14.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PJP and IAK is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between PJP and IAK has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PJP vs. IAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PJP
IAK

Healthcare

100.0%
0.7%

Financial Services

0.0%
99.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

PJP
100.0%
IAK
0.7%

Financial Services

PJP
0.0%
IAK
99.3%

Basic Materials

PJP

-

IAK

-

Communication Services

PJP

-

IAK

-

Consumer Cyclical

PJP

-

IAK

-

Consumer Defensive

PJP

-

IAK

-

Energy

PJP

-

IAK

-

Industrials

PJP

-

IAK

-

Real Estate

PJP

-

IAK

-

Technology

PJP

-

IAK

-

Utilities

PJP

-

IAK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJP vs. IAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJP
PJP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJP Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

IAK
IAK Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAK Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAK Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJP vs. IAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PJPIAKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.21

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.71

2.41

+2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.61

5.86

+8.76

PJP vs. IAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJP Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the IAK Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJP and IAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PJP vs. IAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJP drawdown since its inception was -37.06%, smaller than the maximum IAK drawdown of -77.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJP and IAK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJPIAKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.06%

-77.38%

+40.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-7.62%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-11.58%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.51%

-14.76%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.95%

-44.95%

+11.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

0.00%

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

-16.03%

+7.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.13%

-0.10%

Volatility

PJP vs. IAK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) is 6.18%, while iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that PJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJPIAKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.18%

7.15%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.23%

12.11%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.97%

15.87%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.36%

18.09%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.38%

20.90%

-2.52%

PJP vs. IAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IAK's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJP vs. IAK - Dividend Comparison

PJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than IAK's 2.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAK
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF
2.41%1.69%1.49%1.44%1.69%2.26%2.07%1.84%2.33%1.62%1.68%1.62%
PJP
Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF
0.88%0.98%0.97%1.01%0.95%0.81%0.75%0.77%1.12%0.65%0.91%5.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


PJP and IAK have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAK has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to PJP (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJP dropped -37.06% vs IAK's -77.38%.

On 10-year performance, IAK leads with 13.33% vs 7.06% for PJP. On fees, IAK is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, PJP has been the lower-risk option at 6.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IAK has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAK is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PJP.

IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.88% for PJP.

PJP is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IAK is Financials Equities. PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PJP and 0.38% for IAK.

PJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJP and IAK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer