PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJP vs. BIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PJP vs. BIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJP achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly higher than BIS's -6.36% return. Over the past 10 years, PJP has outperformed BIS with an annualized return of 6.15%, while BIS has yielded a comparatively lower -23.34% annualized return.


PJP

1D
1.20%
1M
1.29%
YTD
2.90%
6M
2.29%
1Y
34.73%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
6.15%

BIS

1D
-3.65%
1M
2.35%
YTD
-6.36%
6M
-4.11%
1Y
-49.58%
3Y*
-21.43%
5Y*
-14.49%
10Y*
-23.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PJP vs. BIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PJP
Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF
2.90%27.98%9.63%-2.18%-2.16%14.58%11.29%4.64%-1.78%15.30%
BIS
ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology
-6.36%-45.95%4.79%-6.54%-2.14%-14.74%-56.01%-41.01%5.14%-36.98%

Correlation

The correlation between PJP and BIS is -0.83, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2010

-0.81

The correlation between PJP and BIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.83 to -0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PJP vs. BIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJP
PJP Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJP Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJP Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

BIS
BIS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIS Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJP vs. BIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJPBISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.78

+0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

-0.91

+4.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.55

-1.25

+12.80

PJP vs. BIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJP Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the BIS Sharpe Ratio of -1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJP and BIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJPBISDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

-1.25

+3.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

-0.33

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

-0.50

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

-0.67

+1.26

Drawdowns

PJP vs. BIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJP drawdown since its inception was -37.06%, smaller than the maximum BIS drawdown of -99.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJP and BIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PJPBISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.06%

-99.87%

+62.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-54.50%

+45.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-66.87%

+50.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.51%

-74.80%

+57.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.95%

-95.25%

+61.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.94%

-99.85%

+96.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.85%

-90.03%

+81.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

39.59%

-36.57%

Volatility

PJP vs. BIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) is 5.33%, while ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS) has a volatility of 13.87%. This indicates that PJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PJPBISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

13.87%

-8.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

30.95%

-18.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.38%

39.68%

-23.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

43.74%

-27.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

46.36%

-27.97%

PJP vs. BIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BIS's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PJP vs. BIS - Dividend Comparison

PJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than BIS's 4.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIS
ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology
4.92%5.25%3.73%1.75%0.00%0.00%0.45%2.11%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PJP
Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF
0.99%0.98%0.97%1.01%0.95%0.81%0.75%0.77%1.12%0.65%0.91%5.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


PJP and BIS have a correlation of -0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIS has higher volatility (13.87%) compared to PJP (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJP dropped -37.06% vs BIS's -99.87%.

On 10-year performance, PJP leads with 6.15% vs -23.34% for BIS. On fees, PJP is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PJP has been the lower-risk option at 5.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PJP has performed better with a 6.15% return vs -23.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PJP is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BIS.

BIS has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 0.99% for PJP.

PJP is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while BIS is Leveraged Equities. PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while BIS tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PJP and 0.95% for BIS.

PJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PJP and BIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer