PJP vs. BIS
PJP (Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF) and BIS (ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology) are both exchange-traded funds - PJP is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while BIS is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PJP returned 6.92%/yr vs -25.49%/yr for BIS. At a correlation of -0.81, they often move in opposite directions. PJP charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BIS.
Performance
PJP vs. BIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJP achieves a 13.12% return, which is significantly higher than BIS's -27.05% return. Over the past 10 years, PJP has outperformed BIS with an annualized return of 6.92%, while BIS has yielded a comparatively lower -25.49% annualized return.
PJP
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 11.80%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 44.07%
- 3Y*
- 17.47%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
BIS
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -18.23%
- 6M
- -24.96%
- YTD
- -27.05%
- 1Y
- -56.42%
- 3Y*
- -28.45%
- 5Y*
- -17.36%
- 10Y*
- -25.49%
PJP vs. BIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 13.12% | 27.98% | 9.63% | -2.18% | -2.16% | 14.58% | 11.29% | 4.64% | -1.78% | 15.30% |
BIS ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology | -27.05% | -45.95% | 4.79% | -6.54% | -2.14% | -14.74% | -56.01% | -41.01% | 5.14% | -36.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJP and BIS is -0.81, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010 | -0.81 |
The correlation between PJP and BIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.81 to -0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJP vs. BIS — Risk / Return Rank
PJP
BIS
PJP vs. BIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PJP | BIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 0.75 | +0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | -0.93 | +5.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.81 | -1.45 | +16.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PJP vs. BIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJP drawdown since its inception was -37.06%, smaller than the maximum BIS drawdown of -99.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJP and BIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJP | BIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.06% | -99.89% | +62.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -60.93% | +51.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.27% | -73.96% | +57.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.51% | -80.19% | +62.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.95% | -95.82% | +61.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.80% | -99.88% | +96.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.81% | -90.07% | +81.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 38.97% | -35.99% |
Volatility
PJP vs. BIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) is 5.67%, while ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS) has a volatility of 12.50%. This indicates that PJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJP | BIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 12.50% | -6.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.91% | 32.06% | -19.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.95% | 41.05% | -24.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 43.99% | -27.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 46.20% | -27.83% |
PJP vs. BIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BIS's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJP vs. BIS - Dividend Comparison
PJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than BIS's 5.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIS ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology | 5.78% | 5.25% | 3.73% | 1.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.45% | 2.11% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.91% | 0.98% | 0.97% | 1.01% | 0.95% | 0.81% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.12% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 5.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PJP and BIS have a correlation of -0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIS has higher volatility (12.50%) compared to PJP (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJP dropped -37.06% vs BIS's -99.89%.
On 10-year performance, PJP leads with 6.92% vs -25.49% for BIS. On fees, PJP is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PJP has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PJP has performed better with a 6.92% return vs -25.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PJP is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BIS.
BIS has the higher dividend yield at 5.78%, compared with 0.91% for PJP.
PJP is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while BIS is Leveraged Equities. PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while BIS tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PJP and 0.95% for BIS.
PJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs -1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJP and BIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer