PJP vs. BIS
PJP (Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF) and BIS (ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology) are both exchange-traded funds - PJP is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while BIS is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PJP returned 6.15%/yr vs -23.34%/yr for BIS. At a correlation of -0.81, they often move in opposite directions. PJP charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BIS.
Performance
PJP vs. BIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PJP achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly higher than BIS's -6.36% return. Over the past 10 years, PJP has outperformed BIS with an annualized return of 6.15%, while BIS has yielded a comparatively lower -23.34% annualized return.
PJP
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 34.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.31%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- 6.15%
BIS
- 1D
- -3.65%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- -6.36%
- 6M
- -4.11%
- 1Y
- -49.58%
- 3Y*
- -21.43%
- 5Y*
- -14.49%
- 10Y*
- -23.34%
PJP vs. BIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 2.90% | 27.98% | 9.63% | -2.18% | -2.16% | 14.58% | 11.29% | 4.64% | -1.78% | 15.30% |
BIS ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology | -6.36% | -45.95% | 4.79% | -6.54% | -2.14% | -14.74% | -56.01% | -41.01% | 5.14% | -36.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between PJP and BIS is -0.83, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2010 | -0.81 |
The correlation between PJP and BIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.83 to -0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PJP vs. BIS — Risk / Return Rank
PJP
BIS
PJP vs. BIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) and ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PJP | BIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.78 | +0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | -0.91 | +4.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.55 | -1.25 | +12.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PJP | BIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | -1.25 | +3.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | -0.33 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | -0.50 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | -0.67 | +1.26 |
Drawdowns
PJP vs. BIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PJP drawdown since its inception was -37.06%, smaller than the maximum BIS drawdown of -99.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJP and BIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PJP | BIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.06% | -99.87% | +62.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -54.50% | +45.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.27% | -66.87% | +50.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.51% | -74.80% | +57.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.95% | -95.25% | +61.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.94% | -99.85% | +96.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -90.03% | +81.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 39.59% | -36.57% |
Volatility
PJP vs. BIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) is 5.33%, while ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIS) has a volatility of 13.87%. This indicates that PJP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PJP | BIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 13.87% | -8.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 30.95% | -18.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.38% | 39.68% | -23.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 43.74% | -27.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 46.36% | -27.97% |
PJP vs. BIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PJP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BIS's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
PJP vs. BIS - Dividend Comparison
PJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than BIS's 4.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIS ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology | 4.92% | 5.25% | 3.73% | 1.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.45% | 2.11% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.99% | 0.98% | 0.97% | 1.01% | 0.95% | 0.81% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.12% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 5.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PJP and BIS have a correlation of -0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIS has higher volatility (13.87%) compared to PJP (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PJP dropped -37.06% vs BIS's -99.87%.
On 10-year performance, PJP leads with 6.15% vs -23.34% for BIS. On fees, PJP is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PJP has been the lower-risk option at 5.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PJP has performed better with a 6.15% return vs -23.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PJP is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BIS.
BIS has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 0.99% for PJP.
PJP is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while BIS is Leveraged Equities. PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index, while BIS tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PJP and 0.95% for BIS.
PJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PJP and BIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer