PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJIO vs. PJFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PJIO vs. PJFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison International Opportunities ETF (PJIO) and PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PJIO vs. PJFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PJIO
PGIM Jennison International Opportunities ETF
-9.68%17.75%4.59%-0.44%
PJFG
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF
-12.45%16.94%31.59%-0.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJIO achieves a -9.68% return, which is significantly higher than PJFG's -12.45% return.


PJIO

1D
4.38%
1M
-11.47%
YTD
-9.68%
6M
-13.47%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PJFG

1D
3.70%
1M
-5.88%
YTD
-12.45%
6M
-11.73%
1Y
14.55%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PJIO vs. PJFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJIO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PJFG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PJIO vs. PJFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJIO
PJIO Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
PJIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJIO Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
PJIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJIO Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

PJFG
PJFG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PJFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJIO vs. PJFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison International Opportunities ETF (PJIO) and PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJIOPJFGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.16

0.62

-0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.38

1.07

-0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.15

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

0.74

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.48

2.51

-2.03

PJIO vs. PJFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJIO Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the PJFG Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJIO and PJFG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJIOPJFGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

0.62

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

1.07

-0.83

Correlation

The correlation between PJIO and PJFG is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PJIO vs. PJFG - Dividend Comparison

PJIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, while PJFG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

PJIO vs. PJFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJIO drawdown since its inception was -19.26%, smaller than the maximum PJFG drawdown of -24.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJIO and PJFG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PJIOPJFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.26%

-24.24%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.26%

-19.00%

-0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.73%

-16.00%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-3.69%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.32%

5.62%

-0.30%

Volatility

PJIO vs. PJFG - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison International Opportunities ETF (PJIO) has a higher volatility of 10.70% compared to PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) at 7.11%. This indicates that PJIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PJIOPJFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.70%

7.11%

+3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.18%

13.40%

+1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.43%

23.54%

-2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.70%

21.07%

-1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.70%

21.07%

-1.37%