PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PJFM vs. VOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PJFM vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF (PJFM) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PJFM vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PJFM
PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF
-0.66%7.50%15.64%-0.08%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
-7.62%10.72%16.38%0.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PJFM achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's -7.62% return.


PJFM

1D
3.44%
1M
-6.07%
YTD
-0.66%
6M
2.18%
1Y
13.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOT

1D
3.09%
1M
-7.40%
YTD
-7.62%
6M
-12.08%
1Y
5.90%
3Y*
10.49%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*
10.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PJFM vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PJFM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.07% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PJFM vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PJFM
PJFM Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PJFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJFM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PJFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJFM Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PJFM vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF (PJFM) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PJFMVOTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

0.28

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.04

0.55

+0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.07

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

0.38

+0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.79

1.20

+2.59

PJFM vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PJFM Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PJFM and VOT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PJFMVOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

0.28

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.42

+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between PJFM and VOT is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PJFM vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

PJFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than VOT's 0.72% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PJFM
PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF
0.63%0.62%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.72%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Drawdowns

PJFM vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PJFM drawdown since its inception was -22.84%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PJFM and VOT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PJFMVOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.84%

-60.16%

+37.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.33%

-15.96%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.73%

-13.36%

+5.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-10.01%

+6.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

5.10%

-1.56%

Volatility

PJFM vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF (PJFM) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) at 6.50%. This indicates that PJFM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PJFMVOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

6.50%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

12.32%

-0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.04%

21.01%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.59%

21.33%

-3.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

20.92%

-3.33%