PIPE vs. SPHQ
PIPE (Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PIPE is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Invesco, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. PIPE is actively managed, while SPHQ is passively managed. Over the past year, PIPE returned 27.43% vs 23.22% for SPHQ. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PIPE charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
PIPE vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIPE achieves a 25.83% return, which is significantly higher than SPHQ's 15.48% return.
PIPE
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 25.83%
- 6M
- 25.88%
- 1Y
- 27.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- YTD
- 15.48%
- 6M
- 16.06%
- 1Y
- 23.22%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
PIPE vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 25.83% | 0.14% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 15.48% | 7.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIPE and SPHQ is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | 0.25 |
The correlation between PIPE and SPHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PIPE vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PIPE
SPHQ
Energy
Utilities
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Energy
PIPE
SPHQ
Utilities
PIPE
SPHQ
Financial Services
PIPE
SPHQ
Basic Materials
PIPE
-
SPHQ
Communication Services
PIPE
-
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
PIPE
-
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
PIPE
-
SPHQ
Healthcare
PIPE
-
SPHQ
Industrials
PIPE
-
SPHQ
Real Estate
PIPE
-
SPHQ
-
Technology
PIPE
-
SPHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIPE vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
PIPE
SPHQ
PIPE vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PIPE | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.32 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | 2.62 | +1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.07 | 11.17 | -1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIPE | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 1.85 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 0.53 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
PIPE vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIPE drawdown since its inception was -15.69%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIPE and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIPE | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.69% | -57.83% | +42.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.33% | -8.90% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.20% | 0.00% | -5.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -10.70% | +6.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 2.08% | +0.65% |
Volatility
PIPE vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 3.49%. This indicates that PIPE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIPE | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 3.49% | +2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.19% | 10.18% | +1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.39% | 12.62% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 16.45% | +2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 17.86% | +0.91% |
PIPE vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIPE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIPE vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
PIPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than SPHQ's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.73% | 3.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.04% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIPE and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIPE has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to SPHQ (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIPE dropped -15.69% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 1-year performance, PIPE leads with 27.43% vs 23.22% for SPHQ. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PIPE has performed better with a 27.43% return vs 23.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PIPE.
PIPE has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 1.04% for SPHQ.
PIPE is categorized as Energy Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PIPE and 0.15% for SPHQ.
PIPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIPE and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer