PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIO vs. IYT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIO vs. IYT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Water ETF (PIO) and iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIO achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than IYT's 12.55% return. Over the past 10 years, PIO has underperformed IYT with an annualized return of 8.55%, while IYT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.45% annualized return.


PIO

1D
0.36%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
0.14%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
2.91%
3Y*
8.97%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*
8.55%

IYT

1D
-0.50%
1M
7.67%
YTD
12.55%
6M
11.63%
1Y
29.07%
3Y*
14.58%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*
10.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIO vs. IYT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIO
Invesco Global Water ETF
0.14%14.25%-0.44%22.19%-24.06%25.97%14.22%35.59%-9.71%26.52%
IYT
iShares Transportation Average ETF
12.55%11.48%4.10%24.62%-21.74%26.41%14.20%20.11%-12.87%18.89%

Correlation

The correlation between PIO and IYT is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2007

0.68

The correlation between PIO and IYT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

PIO vs. IYT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PIO
IYT

Industrials

56.4%
83.3%

Basic Materials

8.6%

-

Technology

8.0%
16.7%

Utilities

7.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%

-

Healthcare

4.6%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

PIO
56.4%
IYT
83.3%

Basic Materials

PIO
8.6%
IYT

-

Technology

PIO
8.0%
IYT
16.7%

Utilities

PIO
7.7%
IYT

-

Consumer Cyclical

PIO
6.3%
IYT

-

Healthcare

PIO
4.6%
IYT

-

Financial Services

PIO
0.2%
IYT

-

Communication Services

PIO

-

IYT

-

Consumer Defensive

PIO

-

IYT

-

Energy

PIO

-

IYT

-

Real Estate

PIO

-

IYT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIO vs. IYT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIO
PIO Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
PIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIO Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIO Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

IYT
IYT Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
IYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYT Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYT Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIO vs. IYT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Water ETF (PIO) and iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PIOIYTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.20

1.45

-1.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.39

2.08

-1.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.25

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

2.42

-2.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.63

7.80

-7.17

PIO vs. IYT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIO Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the IYT Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIO and IYT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PIOIYTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

1.45

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.25

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.45

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.42

-0.22

Drawdowns

PIO vs. IYT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIO drawdown since its inception was -64.88%, which is greater than IYT's maximum drawdown of -60.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIO and IYT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIOIYTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.88%

-60.39%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.14%

-12.09%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.08%

-26.35%

+9.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.27%

-29.15%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.76%

-41.28%

+5.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.07%

-1.50%

-7.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.43%

-9.32%

-6.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.60%

3.74%

+0.86%

Volatility

PIO vs. IYT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Global Water ETF (PIO) is 4.44%, while iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that PIO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIOIYTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

5.92%

-1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.12%

15.44%

-3.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.58%

20.17%

-5.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

22.29%

-4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.22%

23.14%

-4.92%

PIO vs. IYT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IYT's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIO vs. IYT - Dividend Comparison

PIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than IYT's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYT
iShares Transportation Average ETF
0.96%1.00%1.08%1.26%1.40%0.77%0.93%1.29%1.35%0.92%0.96%1.28%
PIO
Invesco Global Water ETF
1.02%1.04%0.78%0.84%1.02%1.19%0.88%1.20%2.00%1.00%1.45%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIO and IYT have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYT has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to PIO (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIO dropped -64.88% vs IYT's -60.39%.

On 10-year performance, IYT leads with 10.45% vs 8.55% for PIO. On fees, IYT is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, PIO has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYT has performed better with a 10.45% return vs 8.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYT is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PIO.

PIO has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.96% for IYT.

PIO is categorized as Water Equities, while IYT is Transportation Equities. PIO tracks NASDAQ OMX Global Water Index, while IYT tracks Dow Jones Transportation Average Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PIO and 0.42% for IYT.

IYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIO and IYT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer