PIO vs. CGW
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Global Water ETF (PIO) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW).
PIO and CGW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PIO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ OMX Global Water Index. It was launched on Jun 13, 2007. CGW is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Water Index. It was launched on May 14, 2007. Both PIO and CGW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PIO or CGW.
Correlation
The correlation between PIO and CGW is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PIO vs. CGW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PIO:
0.51
CGW:
0.58
PIO:
0.79
CGW:
0.89
PIO:
1.10
CGW:
1.11
PIO:
0.66
CGW:
0.58
PIO:
1.56
CGW:
1.91
PIO:
4.75%
CGW:
4.27%
PIO:
14.55%
CGW:
14.00%
PIO:
-64.91%
CGW:
-57.24%
PIO:
-6.94%
CGW:
-10.11%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIO achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly higher than CGW's 0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, PIO has underperformed CGW with an annualized return of 7.23%, while CGW has yielded a comparatively higher 8.62% annualized return.
PIO
2.97%
2.81%
-2.07%
7.04%
5.93%
7.23%
CGW
0.54%
-1.05%
-5.25%
7.95%
6.64%
8.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PIO vs. CGW - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CGW's 0.57% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PIO vs. CGW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PIO
CGW
PIO vs. CGW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Water ETF (PIO) and Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PIO vs. CGW - Dividend Comparison
PIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than CGW's 0.97% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIO Invesco Global Water ETF | 0.76% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 1.19% | 0.88% | 1.19% | 2.00% | 1.00% | 1.45% | 1.62% | 1.42% |
CGW Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF | 0.97% | 0.98% | 1.55% | 1.45% | 1.59% | 1.41% | 1.48% | 2.14% | 1.71% | 1.65% | 1.67% | 1.77% |
Drawdowns
PIO vs. CGW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIO drawdown since its inception was -64.91%, which is greater than CGW's maximum drawdown of -57.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIO and CGW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PIO vs. CGW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Global Water ETF (PIO) is 4.08%, while Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that PIO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.