PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PINK vs. SBIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PINK vs. SBIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PINK vs. SBIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PINK
Simplify Health Care ETF
-7.35%24.34%8.81%3.80%-4.41%12.20%
SBIO
ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
3.20%55.07%3.81%8.68%-28.08%-7.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINK achieves a -7.35% return, which is significantly lower than SBIO's 3.20% return.


PINK

1D
0.59%
1M
-6.30%
YTD
-7.35%
6M
5.14%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
11.27%
5Y*
10Y*

SBIO

1D
0.99%
1M
3.89%
YTD
3.20%
6M
36.23%
1Y
95.78%
3Y*
26.37%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*
9.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PINK vs. SBIO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PINK and SBIO have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Return for Risk

PINK vs. SBIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINK
PINK Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PINK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINK Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PINK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINK Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIO
SBIO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SBIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINK vs. SBIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PINKSBIODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.91

2.92

-2.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.38

3.57

-2.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.45

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

5.66

-4.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.37

19.94

-16.57

PINK vs. SBIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINK Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the SBIO Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINK and SBIO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PINKSBIODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

2.92

-2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.23

+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between PINK and SBIO is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PINK vs. SBIO - Dividend Comparison

PINK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while SBIO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PINK
Simplify Health Care ETF
0.74%0.68%0.32%0.94%0.42%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SBIO
ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
0.00%0.00%3.55%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.04%2.79%1.77%

Drawdowns

PINK vs. SBIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINK drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, smaller than the maximum SBIO drawdown of -63.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINK and SBIO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PINKSBIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.77%

-63.06%

+44.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.81%

-15.08%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.08%

-13.79%

+1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-28.70%

+21.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.86%

4.28%

+0.58%

Volatility

PINK vs. SBIO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) is 7.40%, while ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that PINK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PINKSBIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.40%

12.61%

-5.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.96%

22.09%

-8.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.58%

33.43%

-12.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.57%

33.55%

-15.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.57%

33.34%

-15.77%