PINK vs. MTBA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA).

PINK and MTBA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PINK is an actively managed fund by Simplify. It was launched on Oct 7, 2021. MTBA is an actively managed fund by Simplify. It was launched on Nov 6, 2023.

Performance

PINK vs. MTBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PINK vs. MTBA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PINK Simplify Health Care ETF	-7.89%	24.34%	8.81%	11.53%
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF	-0.43%	7.74%	1.99%	3.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINK achieves a -7.89% return, which is significantly lower than MTBA's -0.43% return.

PINK

• 1D: 3.63%
• 1M: -7.36%
• YTD: -7.89%
• 6M: 6.60%
• 1Y: 15.70%
• 3Y*: 11.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MTBA

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -1.80%
• YTD: -0.43%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 4.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PINK vs. MTBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PINK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MTBA's 0.15% expense ratio.

PINK

Simplify Health Care ETF

MTBA

Simplify MBS ETF

Return for Risk

PINK vs. MTBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINK

PINK Risk / Return Rank: 39
PINK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
PINK Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
PINK Omega Ratio Rank: 36
PINK Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
PINK Martin Ratio Rank: 36

MTBA

MTBA Risk / Return Rank: 76
MTBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
MTBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
MTBA Omega Ratio Rank: 75
MTBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
MTBA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINK vs. MTBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PINK	MTBA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	1.43	-0.66
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	1.97	-0.78
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.27	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.94	1.80	-0.86
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.29	7.36	-4.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PINK vs. MTBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINK Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the MTBA Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINK and MTBA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PINK	MTBA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77	1.43	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	1.37	-0.94

Correlation

The correlation between PINK and MTBA is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PINK vs. MTBA - Dividend Comparison

PINK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than MTBA's 6.08% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PINK Simplify Health Care ETF	0.74%	0.68%	0.32%	0.94%	0.42%	0.04%
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF	6.08%	5.98%	6.03%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PINK vs. MTBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINK drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, which is greater than MTBA's maximum drawdown of -3.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINK and MTBA.

Drawdown Indicators

	PINK	MTBA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.77%	-3.48%	-15.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.81%	-2.69%	-14.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.60%	-1.80%	-10.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.73%	-0.74%	-5.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.80%	0.66%	+4.14%

Volatility

PINK vs. MTBA - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) at 1.65%. This indicates that PINK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PINK	MTBA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.62%	1.65%	+5.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.97%	2.09%	+11.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.57%	3.33%	+17.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.58%	3.97%	+13.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.58%	3.97%	+13.61%