PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PINE vs. BWET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PINE vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINE achieves a 24.46% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 1,293.70% return.


PINE

1D
-0.59%
1M
-2.13%
6M
18.11%
YTD
24.46%
1Y
52.55%
3Y*
13.15%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.41%

BWET

1D
1.74%
1M
57.43%
6M
631.38%
YTD
1,293.70%
1Y
2,229.63%
3Y*
137.18%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
147.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$41.53M$35.69M$28.56M
$3.90M$3.26M$3.57M

PINE vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PINE
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
24.46%6.97%6.13%11.30%
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
1,293.70%96.22%-39.21%14.13%

Correlation

The correlation between PINE and BWET is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PINE vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PINE
PINE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PINE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PINE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

BWET
BWET Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PINE vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PINEBWETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-19.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.94

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

57.28

-53.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.16

215.11

-203.94

PINE vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINE Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 21.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINE and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PINE vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINE drawdown since its inception was -60.00%, which is greater than BWET's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINE and BWET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PINEBWETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.00%

-56.90%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.19%

-41.22%

+28.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.78%

-56.81%

+32.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.22%

0.00%

-7.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.01%

-23.41%

+11.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.80%

10.95%

-6.15%

Volatility

PINE vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) is 7.74%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 32.52%. This indicates that PINE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PINEBWETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.74%

32.52%

-24.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.09%

95.71%

-77.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.03%

107.87%

-84.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.46%

74.46%

-51.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.99%

74.46%

-35.47%

Dividends

PINE vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

PINE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PINE
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
5.80%6.82%6.61%6.51%5.71%5.06%5.47%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


PINE and BWET have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWET has higher volatility (32.52%) compared to PINE (7.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PINE dropped -60.00% vs BWET's -56.90%.

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (21.89 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PINE and BWET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer