PIEL vs. SRVR
PIEL (Pacer International Export Leaders ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PIEL is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Pacer International Export Leaders Index, while SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
PIEL vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIEL achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 19.17% return.
PIEL
- 1D
- -5.07%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 8.89%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRVR
- 1D
- -2.96%
- 1M
- -5.19%
- YTD
- 19.17%
- 6M
- 17.22%
- 1Y
- 9.55%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- —
PIEL vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PIEL Pacer International Export Leaders ETF | 8.89% | -0.43% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 19.17% | 0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIEL and SRVR is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIEL vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank
PIEL
SRVR
PIEL vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer International Export Leaders ETF (PIEL) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIEL | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.29 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
PIEL vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIEL drawdown since its inception was -14.67%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIEL and SRVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIEL | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.67% | -40.99% | +26.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.53% | -12.74% | +7.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -15.26% | +11.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.84% | — |
Volatility
PIEL vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIEL | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.11% | 17.15% | +6.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.11% | 19.78% | +4.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.11% | 21.48% | +2.63% |
PIEL vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PIEL and SRVR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
PIEL vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
PIEL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIEL Pacer International Export Leaders ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 2.56% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIEL and SRVR have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PIEL and SRVR have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 0.00% for PIEL.
PIEL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SRVR is REIT. PIEL tracks Pacer International Export Leaders Index, while SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index.
Find the right allocation for PIEL and SRVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer