PIE vs. SOXQ
PIE (Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PIE is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PIE returned 23.39%/yr vs 59.40%/yr for SOXQ. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PIE charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
PIE vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIE achieves a 39.11% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 96.72% return.
PIE
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 39.11%
- 6M
- 38.18%
- 1Y
- 70.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 32.12%
- YTD
- 96.72%
- 6M
- 91.61%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- 59.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PIE vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 39.11% | 25.98% | -0.27% | 13.71% | -28.77% | -0.16% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 96.72% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIE and SOXQ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.55 |
The correlation between PIE and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
PIE vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PIE
SOXQ
Technology
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
PIE
SOXQ
Industrials
PIE
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
PIE
SOXQ
Energy
PIE
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
PIE
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
PIE
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
PIE
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
PIE
SOXQ
-
Utilities
PIE
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
PIE
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
PIE
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIE vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
PIE
SOXQ
PIE vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PIE | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.72 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.18 | 11.73 | -4.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.52 | 45.01 | -21.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIE | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24 | 5.43 | -2.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.98 | -0.86 |
Drawdowns
PIE vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIE drawdown since its inception was -72.98%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIE and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIE | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.98% | -46.01% | -26.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.87% | -15.59% | +5.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.69% | -39.36% | +10.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | 0.00% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.08% | -12.96% | -13.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 4.06% | -1.05% |
Volatility
PIE vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) is 9.00%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that PIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIE | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 13.44% | -4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.77% | 26.70% | -8.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.91% | 33.78% | -11.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 36.38% | -16.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.35% | 36.38% | -15.03% |
PIE vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIE vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
PIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.70% | 2.28% | 2.33% | 2.59% | 3.45% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 2.29% | 3.32% | 1.63% | 1.48% | 0.80% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIE and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to PIE (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIE dropped -72.98% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.40% vs 23.39% for PIE. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PIE has been the lower-risk option at 9.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.40% return vs 23.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.
PIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
PIE is categorized as Momentum, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for PIE and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 3.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIE and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer