PIE vs. EMXC
PIE (Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PIE is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PIE returned 6.64%/yr vs 12.43%/yr for EMXC. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PIE charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.
Performance
PIE vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PIE having a 38.60% return and EMXC slightly lower at 37.89%.
PIE
- 1D
- -5.18%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 38.60%
- 6M
- 34.63%
- 1Y
- 63.22%
- 3Y*
- 23.20%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.46%
EMXC
- 1D
- -6.44%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 37.89%
- 6M
- 39.80%
- 1Y
- 67.97%
- 3Y*
- 27.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.43%
- 10Y*
- —
PIE vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 38.60% | 25.98% | -0.27% | 13.71% | -28.77% | 14.30% | 21.23% | 26.11% | -22.04% | 15.04% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 37.89% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 12.76% | 15.80% | -12.96% | 7.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIE and EMXC is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017 | 0.76 |
The correlation between PIE and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
PIE vs. EMXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PIE
EMXC
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Technology
PIE
EMXC
Industrials
PIE
EMXC
Financial Services
PIE
EMXC
Energy
PIE
EMXC
Healthcare
PIE
EMXC
Real Estate
PIE
EMXC
Basic Materials
PIE
EMXC
Consumer Cyclical
PIE
EMXC
Communication Services
PIE
EMXC
Utilities
PIE
EMXC
Consumer Defensive
PIE
EMXC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIE vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank
PIE
EMXC
PIE vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PIE | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.50 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.44 | 4.74 | +1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.03 | 18.14 | +1.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PIE vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIE drawdown since its inception was -72.98%, which is greater than EMXC's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIE and EMXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIE | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.98% | -42.81% | -30.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.87% | -14.41% | +4.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.69% | -19.12% | -9.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.32% | -28.91% | -11.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.18% | -6.44% | +1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.01% | -10.15% | -15.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 3.76% | -0.59% |
Volatility
PIE vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) is 13.28%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 14.74%. This indicates that PIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIE | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.28% | 14.74% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.21% | 23.44% | -2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.30% | 25.27% | -0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 18.40% | +2.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 20.25% | +1.32% |
PIE vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIE vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison
PIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than EMXC's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 1.93% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.74% | 2.28% | 2.33% | 2.59% | 3.45% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 2.29% | 3.32% | 1.63% | 1.48% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIE and EMXC have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMXC has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to PIE (13.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIE dropped -72.98% vs EMXC's -42.81%.
On 5-year performance, EMXC leads with 12.43% vs 6.64% for PIE. On fees, EMXC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, PIE has been the lower-risk option at 13.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 12.43% return vs 6.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMXC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.
EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.74% for PIE.
PIE is categorized as Momentum, while EMXC is Emerging Markets Equities. PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for PIE and 0.49% for EMXC.
EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIE and EMXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer