PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIE vs. EMXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIE vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PIE having a 38.60% return and EMXC slightly lower at 37.89%.


PIE

1D
-5.18%
1M
2.84%
YTD
38.60%
6M
34.63%
1Y
63.22%
3Y*
23.20%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*
10.46%

EMXC

1D
-6.44%
1M
4.83%
YTD
37.89%
6M
39.80%
1Y
67.97%
3Y*
27.65%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIE vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
38.60%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%15.04%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
37.89%35.14%2.68%18.96%-19.56%8.54%12.76%15.80%-12.96%7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PIE and EMXC is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017

0.76

The correlation between PIE and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

PIE vs. EMXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PIE
EMXC

Technology

51.1%
52.4%

Industrials

15.3%
6.9%

Financial Services

14.1%
17.4%

Energy

4.6%
3.4%

Healthcare

4.3%
1.8%

Real Estate

3.5%
0.8%

Basic Materials

2.9%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%
4.1%

Communication Services

1.3%
3.0%

Utilities

1.1%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%
2.4%

Technology

PIE
51.1%
EMXC
52.4%

Industrials

PIE
15.3%
EMXC
6.9%

Financial Services

PIE
14.1%
EMXC
17.4%

Energy

PIE
4.6%
EMXC
3.4%

Healthcare

PIE
4.3%
EMXC
1.8%

Real Estate

PIE
3.5%
EMXC
0.8%

Basic Materials

PIE
2.9%
EMXC
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PIE
1.4%
EMXC
4.1%

Communication Services

PIE
1.3%
EMXC
3.0%

Utilities

PIE
1.1%
EMXC
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

PIE
0.3%
EMXC
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIE vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIE vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIEEMXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.50

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.44

4.74

+1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.03

18.14

+1.89

PIE vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIE Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIE and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PIE vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIE drawdown since its inception was -72.98%, which is greater than EMXC's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIE and EMXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIEEMXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.98%

-42.81%

-30.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.87%

-14.41%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.69%

-19.12%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.32%

-28.91%

-11.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.18%

-6.44%

+1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.01%

-10.15%

-15.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

3.76%

-0.59%

Volatility

PIE vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) is 13.28%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 14.74%. This indicates that PIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIEEMXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.28%

14.74%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.21%

23.44%

-2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.30%

25.27%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.85%

18.40%

+2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.57%

20.25%

+1.32%

PIE vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIE vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

PIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than EMXC's 1.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
1.93%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%0.00%0.00%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.74%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIE and EMXC have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMXC has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to PIE (13.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIE dropped -72.98% vs EMXC's -42.81%.

On 5-year performance, EMXC leads with 12.43% vs 6.64% for PIE. On fees, EMXC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, PIE has been the lower-risk option at 13.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 12.43% return vs 6.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMXC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.74% for PIE.

PIE is categorized as Momentum, while EMXC is Emerging Markets Equities. PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for PIE and 0.49% for EMXC.

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIE and EMXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer