PID vs. WDIV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) and WDIV (SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF) are both Global Equities funds - PID tracks the Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR) while WDIV tracks the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PID returned 8.80%/yr vs 7.48%/yr for WDIV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PID charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for WDIV.

Performance

PID vs. WDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PID achieves a 5.45% return, which is significantly lower than WDIV's 8.20% return. Over the past 10 years, PID has outperformed WDIV with an annualized return of 8.80%, while WDIV has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.

PID

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: 1.28%
• YTD: 5.45%
• 6M: 6.61%
• 1Y: 16.04%
• 3Y*: 12.52%
• 5Y*: 8.28%
• 10Y*: 8.80%

WDIV

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: 1.41%
• YTD: 8.20%
• 6M: 10.40%
• 1Y: 21.84%
• 3Y*: 16.97%
• 5Y*: 7.57%
• 10Y*: 7.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PID vs. WDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF	5.45%	24.45%	3.08%	14.28%	-6.48%	24.49%	-6.56%	25.87%	-11.46%	19.05%
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF	8.20%	27.16%	7.61%	8.21%	-6.92%	14.44%	-10.18%	20.12%	-8.81%	19.03%

Correlation

The correlation between PID and WDIV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2013	0.85

The correlation between PID and WDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

PID vs. WDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PID	WDIV
Financial Services	17.5%	23.1%
Utilities	14.2%	13.8%
Communication Services	13.8%	9.8%
Energy	13.3%	7.1%
Technology	8.7%	2.9%
Healthcare	8.4%	4.6%
Industrials	7.9%	12.1%
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	3.9%
Consumer Defensive	6.0%	6.4%
Basic Materials	3.4%	3.1%
Real Estate	0.4%	13.3%

Return for Risk

PID vs. WDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PID

PID Risk / Return Rank: 46
PID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
PID Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
PID Omega Ratio Rank: 47
PID Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
PID Martin Ratio Rank: 44

WDIV

WDIV Risk / Return Rank: 59
WDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
WDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
WDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 62
WDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
WDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PID vs. WDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PID	WDIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	2.16	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	3.10	-0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.39	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	2.55	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.36	9.39	-2.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PID vs. WDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PID Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the WDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PID and WDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PID	WDIV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	2.16	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.60	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.49	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.46	-0.20

Drawdowns

PID vs. WDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PID drawdown since its inception was -66.34%, which is greater than WDIV's maximum drawdown of -42.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PID and WDIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	PID	WDIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.34%	-42.34%	-24.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.47%	-8.61%	+1.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.34%	-11.26%	-2.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.97%	-22.12%	-0.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.07%	-42.34%	-3.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.19%	-1.25%	-0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.04%	-5.85%	-7.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	2.33%	-0.15%

Volatility

PID vs. WDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) is 2.75%, while SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that PID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PID	WDIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.75%	2.95%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.62%	8.01%	-0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.70%	10.18%	-0.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.97%	12.77%	+1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.84%	15.40%	+2.44%

PID vs. WDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PID has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than WDIV's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

PID vs. WDIV - Dividend Comparison

PID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than WDIV's 4.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF	3.27%	3.28%	3.88%	3.31%	3.30%	3.30%	3.16%	3.99%	3.87%	3.46%	3.90%	4.48%
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF	4.04%	4.27%	4.63%	4.73%	5.12%	4.15%	5.55%	3.99%	4.42%	3.62%	4.32%	5.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PID and WDIV in my portfolio?

PID and WDIV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PID or WDIV?

WDIV has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to PID (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PID dropped -66.34% vs WDIV's -42.34%.

Which ETF is better, PID or WDIV?

On 10-year performance, PID leads with 8.80% vs 7.48% for WDIV. On fees, WDIV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PID or WDIV?

Over the 10-year period, PID has performed better with a 8.80% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PID or WDIV?

WDIV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PID or WDIV?

WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.04%, compared with 3.27% for PID.

What is the main difference between PID and WDIV?

PID tracks Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR), while WDIV tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PID and 0.40% for WDIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.