PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PID vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PID vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PID achieves a 5.45% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, PID has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 8.80%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.


PID

1D
-1.07%
1M
1.28%
YTD
5.45%
6M
6.61%
1Y
16.04%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
8.80%

VT

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.91%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.14%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PID vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PID
Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF
5.45%24.45%3.08%14.28%-6.48%24.49%-6.56%25.87%-11.46%19.05%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
12.24%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PID and VT is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2008

0.85

The correlation between PID and VT shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PID vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PID
VT

Financial Services

17.5%
15.9%

Utilities

14.2%
2.7%

Communication Services

13.8%
8.3%

Energy

13.3%
4.3%

Technology

8.7%
27.8%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.1%

Industrials

7.9%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
4.8%

Basic Materials

3.4%
4.2%

Real Estate

0.4%
2.4%

Financial Services

PID
17.5%
VT
15.9%

Utilities

PID
14.2%
VT
2.7%

Communication Services

PID
13.8%
VT
8.3%

Energy

PID
13.3%
VT
4.3%

Technology

PID
8.7%
VT
27.8%

Healthcare

PID
8.4%
VT
8.1%

Industrials

PID
7.9%
VT
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PID
6.4%
VT
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

PID
6.0%
VT
4.8%

Basic Materials

PID
3.4%
VT
4.2%

Real Estate

PID
0.4%
VT
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PID vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PID
PID Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PID Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PID Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PID Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PID vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PIDVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.42

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

3.04

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.36

13.53

-6.17

PID vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PID Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PID and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PIDVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

2.31

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.69

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.74

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.44

-0.17

Drawdowns

PID vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PID drawdown since its inception was -66.34%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PID and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIDVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.34%

-50.27%

-16.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-9.67%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.34%

-16.51%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.97%

-26.38%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.07%

-34.24%

-11.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.19%

-0.88%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.04%

-7.02%

-6.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

2.17%

+0.01%

Volatility

PID vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) is 2.75%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that PID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIDVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

3.83%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.62%

10.17%

-2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.70%

12.70%

-3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.97%

16.05%

-2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.84%

17.23%

+0.61%

PID vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PID has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

PID vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

PID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PID
Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF
3.27%3.28%3.88%3.31%3.30%3.30%3.16%3.99%3.87%3.46%3.90%4.48%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.59%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


PID and VT have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VT has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to PID (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PID dropped -66.34% vs VT's -50.27%.

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.74% vs 8.80% for PID. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.74% return vs 8.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PID.

PID has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.59% for VT.

PID tracks Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR), while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PID and 0.06% for VT.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PID and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer