PID vs. SPGM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) and SPGM (SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF) are both Global Equities funds - PID tracks the Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR) while SPGM tracks the MSCI AC World IMI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PID returned 8.80%/yr vs 12.95%/yr for SPGM. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PID charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPGM.

Performance

PID vs. SPGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PID achieves a 5.45% return, which is significantly lower than SPGM's 12.88% return. Over the past 10 years, PID has underperformed SPGM with an annualized return of 8.80%, while SPGM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.95% annualized return.

PID

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: 1.28%
• YTD: 5.45%
• 6M: 6.61%
• 1Y: 16.04%
• 3Y*: 12.52%
• 5Y*: 8.28%
• 10Y*: 8.80%

SPGM

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 4.94%
• YTD: 12.88%
• 6M: 13.62%
• 1Y: 31.70%
• 3Y*: 21.46%
• 5Y*: 11.48%
• 10Y*: 12.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PID vs. SPGM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF	5.45%	24.45%	3.08%	14.28%	-6.48%	24.49%	-6.56%	25.87%	-11.46%	19.05%
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF	12.88%	23.62%	16.75%	21.34%	-17.53%	21.13%	15.28%	26.58%	-10.12%	23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PID and SPGM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2012	0.70

The correlation between PID and SPGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PID vs. SPGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PID	SPGM
Financial Services	17.5%	16.4%
Utilities	14.2%	2.2%
Communication Services	13.8%	8.5%
Energy	13.3%	4.5%
Technology	8.7%	27.4%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.2%
Industrials	7.9%	13.1%
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	9.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.0%	4.8%
Basic Materials	3.4%	3.9%
Real Estate	0.4%	1.9%

Return for Risk

PID vs. SPGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PID

PID Risk / Return Rank: 46
PID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
PID Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
PID Omega Ratio Rank: 47
PID Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
PID Martin Ratio Rank: 44

SPGM

SPGM Risk / Return Rank: 73
SPGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
SPGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
SPGM Omega Ratio Rank: 74
SPGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SPGM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PID vs. SPGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) and SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PID	SPGM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	2.47	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	3.39	-0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.45	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	3.35	-1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.36	15.14	-7.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PID vs. SPGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PID Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the SPGM Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PID and SPGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PID	SPGM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	2.47	-0.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.72	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.74	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.66	-0.39

Drawdowns

PID vs. SPGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PID drawdown since its inception was -66.34%, which is greater than SPGM's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PID and SPGM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PID	SPGM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.34%	-33.97%	-32.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.47%	-9.50%	+2.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.34%	-16.90%	+3.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.97%	-25.93%	+2.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.07%	-33.97%	-12.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.19%	-0.87%	-1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.04%	-4.81%	-8.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	2.10%	+0.08%

Volatility

PID vs. SPGM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) is 2.75%, while SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that PID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PID	SPGM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.75%	3.92%	-1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.62%	10.35%	-2.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.70%	12.88%	-3.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.97%	16.03%	-2.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.84%	17.57%	+0.27%

PID vs. SPGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PID has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than SPGM's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

PID vs. SPGM - Dividend Comparison

PID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than SPGM's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF	3.27%	3.28%	3.88%	3.31%	3.30%	3.30%	3.16%	3.99%	3.87%	3.46%	3.90%	4.48%
SPGM SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF	1.79%	1.89%	1.98%	2.09%	2.37%	1.94%	1.45%	2.46%	1.89%	2.29%	1.87%	3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PID and SPGM in my portfolio?

PID and SPGM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PID or SPGM?

SPGM has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to PID (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PID dropped -66.34% vs SPGM's -33.97%.

Which ETF is better, PID or SPGM?

On 10-year performance, SPGM leads with 12.95% vs 8.80% for PID. On fees, SPGM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PID or SPGM?

Over the 10-year period, SPGM has performed better with a 12.95% return vs 8.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PID or SPGM?

SPGM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PID or SPGM?

PID has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.79% for SPGM.

What is the main difference between PID and SPGM?

PID tracks Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR), while SPGM tracks MSCI AC World IMI. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PID and 0.09% for SPGM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.