PID vs. GVAL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) and GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) are both Global Equities funds. PID is passively managed, while GVAL is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, PID returned 8.94%/yr vs 11.81%/yr for GVAL. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PID charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for GVAL.

Performance

PID vs. GVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PID achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly lower than GVAL's 17.40% return. Over the past 10 years, PID has underperformed GVAL with an annualized return of 8.94%, while GVAL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.81% annualized return.

PID

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -2.75%
• YTD: 3.12%
• 6M: 3.17%
• 1Y: 14.07%
• 3Y*: 12.22%
• 5Y*: 8.28%
• 10Y*: 8.94%

GVAL

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: 4.28%
• YTD: 17.40%
• 6M: 17.33%
• 1Y: 43.62%
• 3Y*: 27.44%
• 5Y*: 14.14%
• 10Y*: 11.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PID vs. GVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF	3.12%	24.45%	3.08%	14.28%	-6.48%	24.49%	-6.56%	25.87%	-11.46%	19.05%
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF	17.40%	55.87%	2.59%	13.30%	-7.98%	10.70%	-8.51%	17.24%	-14.30%	29.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PID and GVAL is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2014	0.74

The correlation between PID and GVAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.74 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PID vs. GVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PID	GVAL
Financial Services	17.5%	16.9%
Utilities	15.1%	3.7%
Communication Services	13.7%	4.3%
Energy	12.5%	6.8%
Technology	9.1%	9.4%
Healthcare	8.6%	-
Industrials	7.5%	3.6%
Consumer Defensive	6.2%	1.8%
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	2.7%
Basic Materials	3.3%	7.7%
Real Estate	0.4%	6.2%

Return for Risk

PID vs. GVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PID

PID Risk / Return Rank: 42
PID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
PID Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
PID Omega Ratio Rank: 41
PID Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
PID Martin Ratio Rank: 41

GVAL

GVAL Risk / Return Rank: 84
GVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
GVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
GVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PID vs. GVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PID	GVAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	2.82	-1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	3.72	-1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.50	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	3.81	-1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.22	14.52	-8.30

PID vs. GVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PID Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the GVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PID and GVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PID vs. GVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PID drawdown since its inception was -66.34%, which is greater than GVAL's maximum drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PID and GVAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	PID	GVAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.34%	-46.82%	-19.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.47%	-11.50%	+4.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.34%	-15.72%	+2.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.97%	-30.83%	+7.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.07%	-46.82%	+0.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.35%	-2.31%	-2.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.01%	-13.82%	+0.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	3.01%	-0.74%

Volatility

PID vs. GVAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) is 2.68%, while Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that PID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PID	GVAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.68%	6.37%	-3.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.86%	13.81%	-5.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.83%	15.55%	-5.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.96%	18.60%	-4.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.67%	19.00%	-1.33%

PID vs. GVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PID has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than GVAL's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

PID vs. GVAL - Dividend Comparison

PID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than GVAL's 2.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF	2.43%	2.93%	4.75%	6.12%	5.05%	2.97%	1.90%	2.84%	4.65%	2.00%	2.54%	2.11%
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF	3.61%	3.28%	3.88%	3.31%	3.30%	3.30%	3.16%	3.99%	3.87%	3.46%	3.90%	4.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PID and GVAL in my portfolio?

PID and GVAL have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PID or GVAL?

GVAL has higher volatility (6.37%) compared to PID (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PID dropped -66.34% vs GVAL's -46.82%.

Which ETF is better, PID or GVAL?

On 10-year performance, GVAL leads with 11.81% vs 8.94% for PID. On fees, PID is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PID or GVAL?

Over the 10-year period, GVAL has performed better with a 11.81% return vs 8.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PID or GVAL?

PID is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for GVAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PID or GVAL?

PID has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 2.43% for GVAL.

What is the main difference between PID and GVAL?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PID and 0.64% for GVAL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.