PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGHYX vs. HYS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGHYX vs. HYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX) and PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RGHYX having a 1.46% return and HYS slightly lower at 1.42%. Over the past 10 years, RGHYX has outperformed HYS with an annualized return of 6.09%, while HYS has yielded a comparatively lower 5.36% annualized return.


RGHYX

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.46%
6M
2.25%
1Y
7.52%
3Y*
8.87%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
6.09%

HYS

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.42%
6M
2.14%
1Y
7.32%
3Y*
8.61%
5Y*
5.12%
10Y*
5.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGHYX vs. HYS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RGHYX
RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund
1.46%9.02%7.14%12.88%-8.48%3.72%9.65%15.83%-0.73%6.72%
HYS
PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.42%8.80%8.42%11.38%-5.42%4.77%3.27%10.22%-1.05%5.75%

Correlation

The correlation between RGHYX and HYS is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012

0.56

The correlation between RGHYX and HYS shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGHYX vs. HYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGHYX
RGHYX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
RGHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
RGHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

HYS
HYS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYS Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGHYX vs. HYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX) and PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RGHYXHYSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.92

2.12

+0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.55

3.28

+1.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.40

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.89

-0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.65

15.89

-2.25

RGHYX vs. HYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGHYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the HYS Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGHYX and HYS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RGHYXHYSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

2.12

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

0.82

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.31

0.79

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

0.82

+0.62

Drawdowns

RGHYX vs. HYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGHYX drawdown since its inception was -17.38%, smaller than the maximum HYS drawdown of -20.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGHYX and HYS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGHYXHYSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.38%

-20.91%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.65%

-1.88%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.01%

-4.98%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.79%

-10.61%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.38%

-20.91%

+3.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.05%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-1.53%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

0.46%

+0.11%

Volatility

RGHYX vs. HYS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund (RGHYX) is 0.85%, while PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that RGHYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGHYXHYSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

1.25%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.12%

2.75%

-0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61%

3.47%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.38%

6.26%

-1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.67%

6.85%

-2.18%

RGHYX vs. HYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGHYX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than HYS's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGHYX vs. HYS - Dividend Comparison

RGHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, less than HYS's 7.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYS
PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF
7.35%7.20%7.43%6.44%5.01%3.74%4.52%4.98%4.64%5.01%5.13%5.22%
RGHYX
RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund
6.38%6.68%6.91%6.22%6.04%5.29%5.54%4.88%6.79%3.88%4.44%4.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


RGHYX and HYS have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYS has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to RGHYX (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGHYX dropped -17.38% vs HYS's -20.91%.

RGHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGHYX and HYS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer