PHYL vs. SEIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) and Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (SEIX).

PHYL and SEIX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PHYL is an actively managed fund by Prudential. It was launched on Sep 24, 2018. SEIX is a passively managed fund by Virtus that tracks the performance of the Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index. It was launched on Apr 23, 2019.

Performance

PHYL vs. SEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) and Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (SEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PHYL vs. SEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PHYL PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF	-0.69%	9.65%	8.45%	11.91%	-11.80%	6.20%	6.31%	6.81%
SEIX Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF	0.20%	5.10%	8.42%	12.51%	-1.77%	5.49%	3.17%	3.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYL achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly lower than SEIX's 0.20% return.

PHYL

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: -0.69%
• 6M: 0.68%
• 1Y: 7.47%
• 3Y*: 8.62%
• 5Y*: 3.95%
• 10Y*: —

SEIX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 0.80%
• YTD: 0.20%
• 6M: 1.30%
• 1Y: 5.15%
• 3Y*: 7.64%
• 5Y*: 5.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYL vs. SEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHYL has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than SEIX's 0.57% expense ratio.

SEIX

Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF

PHYL

PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF

Return for Risk

PHYL vs. SEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYL

PHYL Risk / Return Rank: 85
PHYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PHYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
PHYL Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PHYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
PHYL Martin Ratio Rank: 84

SEIX

SEIX Risk / Return Rank: 89
SEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
SEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
SEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYL vs. SEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) and Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (SEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PHYL	SEIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	1.98	-0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	2.78	-0.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.51	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	2.05	-0.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.37	10.51	-1.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PHYL vs. SEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYL Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the SEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYL and SEIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PHYL	SEIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.68	1.98	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	1.92	-1.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	1.19	-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between PHYL and SEIX is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PHYL vs. SEIX - Dividend Comparison

PHYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.88%, more than SEIX's 7.49% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PHYL PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF	7.88%	7.05%	8.28%	7.62%	6.55%	6.13%	7.51%	7.31%	1.79%
SEIX Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF	7.49%	7.52%	8.09%	8.74%	5.76%	4.16%	3.75%	3.82%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PHYL vs. SEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYL drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, which is greater than SEIX's maximum drawdown of -17.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYL and SEIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHYL	SEIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.07%	-17.51%	-4.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.80%	-2.37%	-1.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.11%	-6.69%	-9.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.76%	-0.25%	-1.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.13%	-0.89%	-2.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.79%	0.48%	+0.31%

Volatility

PHYL vs. SEIX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) has a higher volatility of 1.88% compared to Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (SEIX) at 0.72%. This indicates that PHYL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHYL	SEIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.88%	0.72%	+1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.50%	1.34%	+1.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.46%	2.62%	+1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.66%	2.92%	+2.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.73%	4.39%	+3.34%