PHYD vs. NJNK
PHYD (Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -) and NJNK (Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PHYD returned 7.97% vs 6.85% for NJNK. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PHYD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for NJNK.
Performance
PHYD vs. NJNK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHYD achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly higher than NJNK's 1.50% return.
PHYD
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 6M
- 3.00%
- 1Y
- 7.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NJNK
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 6.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PHYD vs. NJNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - | 2.49% | 8.84% | 1.37% |
NJNK Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF | 1.50% | 9.03% | 0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHYD and NJNK is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between PHYD and NJNK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHYD vs. NJNK — Risk / Return Rank
PHYD
NJNK
PHYD vs. NJNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) and Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF (NJNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHYD | NJNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.33 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 2.61 | +1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.70 | 10.86 | +4.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHYD | NJNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 1.72 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.74 | 1.33 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
PHYD vs. NJNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHYD drawdown since its inception was -4.33%, roughly equal to the maximum NJNK drawdown of -4.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYD and NJNK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHYD | NJNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.33% | -4.48% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.10% | -2.63% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.14% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.62% | -0.49% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.51% | 0.63% | -0.12% |
Volatility
PHYD vs. NJNK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) is 1.07%, while Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF (NJNK) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that PHYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NJNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHYD | NJNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 1.41% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.56% | 3.11% | -0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35% | 4.00% | -0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 4.80% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 4.80% | -0.21% |
PHYD vs. NJNK - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHYD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than NJNK's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHYD vs. NJNK - Dividend Comparison
PHYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.02%, more than NJNK's 6.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NJNK Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF | 6.42% | 6.34% | 2.05% | 0.00% |
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - | 9.02% | 6.63% | 6.80% | 6.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHYD and NJNK have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NJNK has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to PHYD (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYD dropped -4.33% vs NJNK's -4.48%.
On 1-year performance, PHYD leads with 7.97% vs 6.85% for NJNK. On fees, NJNK is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, PHYD has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PHYD has performed better with a 7.97% return vs 6.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NJNK is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PHYD.
PHYD has the higher dividend yield at 9.02%, compared with 6.42% for NJNK.
They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Columbia. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PHYD and 0.46% for NJNK.
PHYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHYD and NJNK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer