PHYD vs. BBHY

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PHYD (Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -) and BBHY (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. PHYD is actively managed, while BBHY is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PHYD returned 8.82%/yr vs 8.76%/yr for BBHY. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PHYD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBHY.

Performance

PHYD vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYD achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly higher than BBHY's 1.73% return.

PHYD

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -0.14%
• YTD: 2.49%
• 6M: 3.00%
• 1Y: 7.97%
• 3Y*: 8.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBHY

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 1.73%
• 6M: 2.18%
• 1Y: 7.10%
• 3Y*: 8.76%
• 5Y*: 4.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYD vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -	2.49%	8.84%	7.35%	8.07%
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.73%	8.51%	7.81%	8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYD and BBHY is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2023	0.83

The correlation between PHYD and BBHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

PHYD vs. BBHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PHYD	BBHY
Technology	0.8%	4.0%
Healthcare	0.7%	5.4%
Utilities	0.7%	2.0%
Industrials	0.7%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	2.5%
Energy	0.3%	5.2%
Consumer Cyclical	0.2%	10.0%
Real Estate	0.1%	3.9%
Basic Materials	-	3.2%
Communication Services	-	7.9%
Financial Services	-	4.1%

Return for Risk

PHYD vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYD

PHYD Risk / Return Rank: 80
PHYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
PHYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PHYD Omega Ratio Rank: 82
PHYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
PHYD Martin Ratio Rank: 81

BBHY

BBHY Risk / Return Rank: 65
BBHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BBHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
BBHY Omega Ratio Rank: 65
BBHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
BBHY Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYD vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PHYD	BBHY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	1.97	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.80	2.99	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.39	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.82	3.00	+0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.70	13.50	+2.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PHYD vs. BBHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYD Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the BBHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYD and BBHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PHYD	BBHY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39	1.97	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.74	0.64	+1.10

Drawdowns

PHYD vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYD drawdown since its inception was -4.33%, smaller than the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYD and BBHY.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHYD	BBHY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.33%	-24.98%	+20.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.10%	-2.37%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.14%	-5.00%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-0.14%	-0.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.62%	-2.37%	+1.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.51%	0.53%	-0.02%

Volatility

PHYD vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) is 1.07%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) has a volatility of 1.13%. This indicates that PHYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHYD	BBHY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.07%	1.13%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.56%	2.85%	-0.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.35%	3.62%	-0.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.59%	7.26%	-2.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.59%	7.53%	-2.94%

PHYD vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHYD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

PHYD vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison

PHYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.02%, more than BBHY's 6.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	6.94%	7.24%	7.18%	6.49%	5.92%	4.06%	4.73%	4.99%	5.02%	4.81%	1.42%
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -	9.02%	6.63%	6.80%	6.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PHYD and BBHY in my portfolio?

PHYD and BBHY have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PHYD or BBHY?

BBHY has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to PHYD (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYD dropped -4.33% vs BBHY's -24.98%.

Which ETF is better, PHYD or BBHY?

On 3-year performance, PHYD leads with 8.82% vs 8.76% for BBHY. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PHYD or BBHY?

Over the 3-year period, PHYD has performed better with a 8.82% return vs 8.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PHYD or BBHY?

BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PHYD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PHYD or BBHY?

PHYD has the higher dividend yield at 9.02%, compared with 6.94% for BBHY.

What is the main difference between PHYD and BBHY?

They also come from different issuers: Putnam and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PHYD and 0.15% for BBHY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PHYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.