PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHTUX vs. PSSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHTUX vs. PSSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) and Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund (PSSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHTUX achieves a 11.33% return, which is significantly lower than PSSMX's 15.97% return. Over the past 10 years, PHTUX has outperformed PSSMX with an annualized return of 11.81%, while PSSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.83% annualized return.


PHTUX

1D
0.50%
1M
5.33%
YTD
11.33%
6M
11.96%
1Y
27.49%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
11.81%

PSSMX

1D
0.85%
1M
2.53%
YTD
15.97%
6M
14.78%
1Y
31.83%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
6.80%
10Y*
10.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHTUX vs. PSSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHTUX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund
11.33%19.64%17.26%20.30%-18.48%19.08%15.94%25.59%-9.48%20.48%
PSSMX
Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund
15.97%5.34%16.60%15.18%-16.69%25.39%10.65%21.99%-9.42%12.46%

Correlation

The correlation between PHTUX and PSSMX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.85

The correlation between PHTUX and PSSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHTUX vs. PSSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHTUX
PHTUX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PHTUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHTUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHTUX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PHTUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHTUX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

PSSMX
PSSMX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PSSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PSSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHTUX vs. PSSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) and Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund (PSSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHTUXPSSMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.40

1.95

+0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.32

2.84

+0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.34

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

3.89

-0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.21

13.00

+2.21

PHTUX vs. PSSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHTUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the PSSMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHTUX and PSSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHTUXPSSMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

1.95

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.31

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.47

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.41

+0.29

Drawdowns

PHTUX vs. PSSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHTUX drawdown since its inception was -31.76%, smaller than the maximum PSSMX drawdown of -58.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTUX and PSSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHTUXPSSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.76%

-58.43%

+26.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-8.76%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.49%

-24.30%

+7.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.50%

-27.01%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.76%

-44.85%

+13.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.07%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-9.52%

+4.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

2.62%

-0.78%

Volatility

PHTUX vs. PSSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) is 3.33%, while Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund (PSSMX) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that PHTUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHTUXPSSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

4.47%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

11.69%

-2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.72%

17.46%

-5.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.41%

21.76%

-6.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

22.92%

-7.38%

PHTUX vs. PSSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHTUX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PSSMX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHTUX vs. PSSMX - Dividend Comparison

PHTUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than PSSMX's 8.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHTUX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund
4.37%4.86%4.44%2.95%9.50%4.59%3.35%4.08%4.51%2.40%2.44%1.64%
PSSMX
Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund
8.61%9.98%15.91%3.75%10.45%8.23%1.67%6.56%13.08%6.03%6.15%8.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHTUX and PSSMX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSSMX has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to PHTUX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHTUX dropped -31.76% vs PSSMX's -58.43%.

PHTUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHTUX and PSSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer