PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTNX vs. FRIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTNX vs. FRIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PLTNX

1D
1.77%
1M
0.15%
6M
6.93%
YTD
10.12%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
17.03%
5Y*
9.86%
10Y*
11.48%
ALL TIME*
10.65%

FRIMX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PLTNX vs. FRIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLTNX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund
10.12%19.89%17.25%20.33%-18.49%19.70%15.78%26.17%-9.84%21.03%
FRIMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I
3.59%9.94%4.30%8.06%-11.66%2.78%8.57%10.57%-1.82%7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTNX and FRIMX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014

0.75

The correlation between PLTNX and FRIMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTNX vs. FRIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLTNX
PLTNX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PLTNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FRIMX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLTNX vs. FRIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund (PLTNX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLTNXFRIMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.97

PLTNX vs. FRIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLTNX vs. FRIMX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTNXFRIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

Volatility

PLTNX vs. FRIMX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTNXFRIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.82%

PLTNX vs. FRIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTNX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FRIMX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PLTNX vs. FRIMX - Dividend Comparison

PLTNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than FRIMX's 3.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRIMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I
2.80%3.11%3.01%2.82%4.52%3.54%2.41%2.56%4.67%8.56%1.67%1.68%
PLTNX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2055 Fund
4.17%4.59%4.40%2.84%9.11%4.23%3.11%3.47%4.68%2.21%1.99%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTNX and FRIMX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTNX and FRIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer