PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHTUX vs. FFSZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHTUX vs. FFSZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHTUX achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly lower than FFSZX's 12.19% return.


PHTUX

1D
-1.85%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
8.29%
6M
7.46%
1Y
21.59%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
11.87%

FFSZX

1D
-2.22%
1M
0.76%
YTD
12.19%
6M
11.48%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
20.21%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHTUX vs. FFSZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PHTUX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund
8.29%19.64%17.26%20.30%-18.48%19.08%15.94%8.89%
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
12.19%24.08%14.41%20.78%-18.05%16.81%18.36%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PHTUX and FFSZX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.95

The correlation between PHTUX and FFSZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHTUX vs. FFSZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHTUX
PHTUX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
PHTUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHTUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHTUX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
PHTUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHTUX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FFSZX
FFSZX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FFSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHTUX vs. FFSZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHTUXFFSZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

2.93

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.14

12.84

-0.70

PHTUX vs. FFSZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHTUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the FFSZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHTUX and FFSZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PHTUX vs. FFSZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHTUX drawdown since its inception was -31.76%, roughly equal to the maximum FFSZX drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTUX and FFSZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHTUXFFSZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.76%

-31.00%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-9.77%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.49%

-15.36%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.50%

-27.17%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-2.50%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.67%

-5.77%

+1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.23%

-0.33%

Volatility

PHTUX vs. FFSZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund (PHTUX) is 5.23%, while Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that PHTUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHTUXFFSZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

6.20%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.32%

11.93%

-1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.57%

13.92%

-1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

15.22%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.55%

17.12%

-1.57%

PHTUX vs. FFSZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHTUX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSZX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHTUX vs. FFSZX - Dividend Comparison

PHTUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, less than FFSZX's 5.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
5.11%3.82%2.92%2.26%8.99%7.98%2.41%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PHTUX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2050 Fund
4.49%4.86%4.44%2.95%9.50%4.59%3.35%4.08%4.51%2.40%2.44%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, PHTUX and FFSZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFSZX has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to PHTUX (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHTUX dropped -31.76% vs FFSZX's -31.00%.

FFSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHTUX and FFSZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer