FFSZX vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FFSZX (Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both funds - FFSZX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Fidelity, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 5 years, FFSZX returned 10.89%/yr vs 13.27%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FFSZX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

FFSZX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFSZX achieves a 14.74% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.35% return.

FFSZX

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 3.06%
• YTD: 14.74%
• 6M: 14.23%
• 1Y: 31.47%
• 3Y*: 21.11%
• 5Y*: 10.89%
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -3.93%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 17.91%
• 3Y*: 22.13%
• 5Y*: 13.27%
• 10Y*: 18.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFSZX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FFSZX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6	14.74%	24.08%	14.41%	20.78%	-18.05%	16.81%	18.36%	9.18%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	1.35%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	12.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FFSZX and SCHG is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019	0.84

The correlation between FFSZX and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFSZX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFSZX

FFSZX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FFSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FFSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FFSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FFSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FFSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 28
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFSZX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFSZX	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	1.11	+1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	1.56	+1.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.20	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	1.10	+2.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.61	3.58	+11.03

FFSZX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFSZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFSZX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFSZX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFSZX drawdown since its inception was -31.00%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSZX and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFSZX	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.00%	-34.59%	+3.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.77%	-16.41%	+6.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.36%	-23.39%	+8.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.17%	-34.59%	+7.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	-6.46%	+6.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.77%	-5.20%	-0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	5.02%	-2.80%

Volatility

FFSZX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 5.73% and 5.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFSZX	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.73%	5.91%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.72%	12.52%	-0.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.75%	16.24%	-2.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.19%	22.38%	-7.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.11%	21.58%	-4.47%

FFSZX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFSZX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFSZX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

FFSZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFSZX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6	4.99%	3.82%	2.92%	2.26%	8.99%	7.98%	2.41%	1.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFSZX and SCHG in my portfolio?

FFSZX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFSZX or SCHG?

SCHG has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to FFSZX (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFSZX dropped -31.00% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.