PHO vs. USO
PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - PHO is a Water Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PHO returned 11.78%/yr vs 2.01%/yr for USO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PHO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
PHO vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHO achieves a -5.09% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 60.87% return. Over the past 10 years, PHO has outperformed USO with an annualized return of 11.78%, while USO has yielded a comparatively lower 2.01% annualized return.
PHO
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- -5.09%
- 6M
- -6.73%
- 1Y
- -3.23%
- 3Y*
- 7.30%
- 5Y*
- 5.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
USO
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -21.05%
- YTD
- 60.87%
- 6M
- 58.26%
- 1Y
- 45.61%
- 3Y*
- 21.25%
- 5Y*
- 17.42%
- 10Y*
- 2.01%
PHO vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | -5.09% | 7.62% | 8.59% | 18.85% | -14.86% | 31.28% | 20.83% | 37.57% | -6.40% | 23.55% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 60.87% | -8.46% | 13.35% | -4.94% | 28.97% | 64.68% | -67.79% | 32.61% | -19.57% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHO and USO is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2006 | 0.26 |
The correlation between PHO and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHO vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
PHO
USO
PHO vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHO | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.21 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 1.68 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.56 | 4.57 | -5.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHO vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHO drawdown since its inception was -55.62%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHO and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHO | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.62% | -98.19% | +42.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.78% | -27.26% | +13.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.19% | -27.26% | +8.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.60% | -36.23% | +7.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.92% | -86.75% | +51.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.33% | -88.16% | +77.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.18% | -75.31% | +65.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.79% | 10.02% | -4.23% |
Volatility
PHO vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) is 4.40%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 11.79%. This indicates that PHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHO | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 11.79% | -7.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.31% | 39.34% | -28.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.17% | 44.35% | -29.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 36.32% | -17.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.45% | 39.02% | -19.57% |
PHO vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHO vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
PHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | 0.61% | 0.54% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.47% | 0.75% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHO and USO have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USO has higher volatility (11.79%) compared to PHO (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHO dropped -55.62% vs USO's -98.19%.
On 10-year performance, PHO leads with 11.78% vs 2.01% for USO. On fees, PHO is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, PHO has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PHO has performed better with a 11.78% return vs 2.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PHO is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.
PHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
PHO is categorized as Water Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. PHO tracks NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PHO and 0.86% for USO.
USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHO and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer