PHO vs. ITA
PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) and ITA (iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PHO is a Water Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, while ITA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PHO returned 11.71%/yr vs 15.34%/yr for ITA. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PHO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ITA.
Performance
PHO vs. ITA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHO achieves a -4.97% return, which is significantly lower than ITA's 8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, PHO has underperformed ITA with an annualized return of 11.71%, while ITA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.34% annualized return.
PHO
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- -4.97%
- 6M
- -6.44%
- 1Y
- -1.80%
- 3Y*
- 7.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
ITA
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 8.97%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- 1Y
- 30.42%
- 3Y*
- 27.30%
- 5Y*
- 16.86%
- 10Y*
- 15.34%
PHO vs. ITA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | -4.97% | 7.62% | 8.59% | 18.85% | -14.86% | 31.28% | 20.83% | 37.57% | -6.40% | 23.55% |
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 8.97% | 48.64% | 15.81% | 14.33% | 9.96% | 9.39% | -13.57% | 30.51% | -7.22% | 35.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHO and ITA is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PHO and ITA has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PHO vs. ITA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PHO
ITA
Industrials
Utilities
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
PHO
ITA
Utilities
PHO
ITA
-
Technology
PHO
ITA
Basic Materials
PHO
ITA
-
Healthcare
PHO
ITA
-
Financial Services
PHO
ITA
-
Communication Services
PHO
-
ITA
-
Consumer Cyclical
PHO
-
ITA
-
Consumer Defensive
PHO
-
ITA
-
Energy
PHO
-
ITA
-
Real Estate
PHO
-
ITA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHO vs. ITA — Risk / Return Rank
PHO
ITA
PHO vs. ITA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHO | ITA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.25 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 1.97 | -2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.58 | 5.20 | -5.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHO vs. ITA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHO drawdown since its inception was -55.62%, smaller than the maximum ITA drawdown of -59.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHO and ITA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHO | ITA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.62% | -59.72% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.78% | -15.82% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.19% | -15.82% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.60% | -18.72% | -9.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.92% | -51.00% | +16.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.21% | -6.64% | -3.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.18% | -9.45% | -0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.59% | 5.97% | -0.38% |
Volatility
PHO vs. ITA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) is 4.41%, while iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) has a volatility of 9.07%. This indicates that PHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHO | ITA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 9.07% | -4.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.15% | 18.47% | -7.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.12% | 21.74% | -6.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.40% | 20.21% | -1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 23.22% | -3.76% |
PHO vs. ITA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ITA's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHO vs. ITA - Dividend Comparison
PHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, more than ITA's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.85% | 0.93% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 1.07% | 1.54% | 1.13% | 0.91% | 1.07% | 1.04% |
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | 0.58% | 0.54% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.47% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHO and ITA have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITA has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to PHO (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHO dropped -55.62% vs ITA's -59.72%.
On 10-year performance, ITA leads with 15.34% vs 11.71% for PHO. On fees, ITA is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, PHO has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITA has performed better with a 15.34% return vs 11.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITA is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PHO.
PHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.46% for ITA.
PHO is categorized as Water Equities, while ITA is Aerospace & Defense. PHO tracks NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, while ITA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PHO and 0.38% for ITA.
ITA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHO and ITA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer