PHO vs. IDMO
PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) and IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PHO is a Water Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, while IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PHO returned 11.61%/yr vs 12.40%/yr for IDMO. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PHO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IDMO.
Performance
PHO vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHO achieves a -1.62% return, which is significantly lower than IDMO's 7.56% return. Over the past 10 years, PHO has underperformed IDMO with an annualized return of 11.61%, while IDMO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.40% annualized return.
PHO
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- 6M
- -6.81%
- YTD
- -1.62%
- 1Y
- -1.91%
- 3Y*
- 7.03%
- 5Y*
- 5.35%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
IDMO
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- 6M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 20.05%
- 3Y*
- 24.23%
- 5Y*
- 15.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
PHO vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | -1.62% | 7.62% | 8.59% | 18.85% | -14.86% | 31.28% | 20.83% | 37.57% | -6.40% | 23.55% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 7.56% | 42.17% | 12.79% | 20.16% | -12.03% | 14.31% | 22.01% | 26.09% | -16.66% | 29.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHO and IDMO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012 | 0.46 |
The correlation between PHO and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PHO vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PHO
IDMO
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
PHO
IDMO
Utilities
PHO
IDMO
Technology
PHO
IDMO
Healthcare
PHO
IDMO
Basic Materials
PHO
IDMO
Financial Services
PHO
IDMO
Communication Services
PHO
-
IDMO
Consumer Cyclical
PHO
-
IDMO
Consumer Defensive
PHO
-
IDMO
Energy
PHO
-
IDMO
Real Estate
PHO
-
IDMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHO vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank
PHO
IDMO
PHO vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHO | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.20 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 1.64 | -1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.32 | 6.39 | -6.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHO vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHO drawdown since its inception was -55.62%, which is greater than IDMO's maximum drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHO and IDMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHO | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.62% | -39.38% | -16.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.78% | -12.31% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.19% | -12.65% | -6.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.60% | -27.07% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.92% | -31.34% | -3.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.05% | -4.56% | -2.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.17% | -9.70% | -0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.07% | 3.14% | +2.93% |
Volatility
PHO vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) is 5.24%, while Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a volatility of 5.90%. This indicates that PHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHO | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 5.90% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.84% | 16.88% | -5.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.57% | 18.54% | -2.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 18.13% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 17.89% | +1.57% |
PHO vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHO vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison
PHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than IDMO's 3.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 3.72% | 3.71% | 2.24% | 2.89% | 3.66% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 2.78% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.18% | 2.52% |
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | 0.58% | 0.54% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.47% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHO and IDMO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDMO has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to PHO (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHO dropped -55.62% vs IDMO's -39.38%.
On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.40% vs 11.61% for PHO. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PHO has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.40% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PHO.
IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 0.58% for PHO.
PHO is categorized as Water Equities, while IDMO is Momentum. PHO tracks NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PHO and 0.25% for IDMO.
IDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHO and IDMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer