PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHIN vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHIN vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHIN achieves a 34.26% return, which is significantly higher than SPMO's 29.45% return.


PHIN

1D
3.69%
1M
12.04%
YTD
34.26%
6M
37.26%
1Y
97.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPMO

1D
-0.36%
1M
6.27%
YTD
29.45%
6M
27.18%
1Y
41.07%
3Y*
42.30%
5Y*
22.83%
10Y*
20.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHIN vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PHIN
PHINIA Inc.
34.26%32.99%62.69%2.87%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
29.45%26.58%45.82%19.84%

Correlation

The correlation between PHIN and SPMO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHIN vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHIN
PHIN Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PHIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHIN Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PHIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHIN Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHIN vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHINSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.37

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.82

3.25

+1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.44

12.18

+1.26

PHIN vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHIN Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is higher than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHIN and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PHIN vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHIN drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHIN and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHINSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.71%

-30.95%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.37%

-12.70%

-7.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-4.87%

+2.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.04%

-4.59%

-7.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.29%

3.38%

+3.91%

Volatility

PHIN vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) is 10.81%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 11.77%. This indicates that PHIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHINSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.81%

11.77%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.17%

17.74%

+6.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.37%

20.51%

+9.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.62%

19.87%

+22.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.62%

20.60%

+22.02%

Dividends

PHIN vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

PHIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than SPMO's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHIN
PHINIA Inc.
1.37%1.72%2.08%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.68%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHIN and SPMO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (11.77%) compared to PHIN (10.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHIN dropped -34.71% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

PHIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHIN and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer