PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHIN vs. HSBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PHIN vs. HSBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) and HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHIN achieves a 18.34% return, which is significantly lower than HSBC's 39.85% return.


PHIN

1D
0.73%
1M
-2.80%
6M
4.24%
YTD
18.34%
1Y
51.29%
3Y*
39.57%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
36.79%

HSBC

1D
-0.63%
1M
9.96%
6M
25.01%
YTD
39.85%
1Y
81.91%
3Y*
46.00%
5Y*
39.37%
10Y*
19.27%
ALL TIME*
7.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$138.88M$132.62M$146.00M
$30.52M$25.54M$30.06M

PHIN vs. HSBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PHIN
PHINIA Inc.
18.34%32.99%62.69%2.87%
HSBC
HSBC Holdings plc
39.85%67.91%34.48%6.63%

Correlation

The correlation between PHIN and HSBC is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023

0.30

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PHIN:

$2.72B

HSBC:

$365.74B

EPS

PHIN:

$3.47

HSBC:

$6.41

PE Ratio

PHIN:

21.18

HSBC:

16.61

PEG Ratio

PHIN:

1.08

HSBC:

0.82

PS Ratio

PHIN:

0.79

HSBC:

2.88

PB Ratio

PHIN:

1.81

HSBC:

2.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

PHIN:

$3.62B

HSBC:

$128.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PHIN:

$789.00M

HSBC:

$65.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

PHIN:

$440.00M

HSBC:

$34.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHIN vs. HSBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PHIN
PHIN Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PHIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHIN Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PHIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHIN Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

HSBC
HSBC Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
HSBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSBC Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
HSBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSBC Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PHIN vs. HSBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) and HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHINHSBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.50

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

5.07

-2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.28

18.15

-11.87

PHIN vs. HSBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHIN Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the HSBC Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHIN and HSBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PHIN vs. HSBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHIN drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, smaller than the maximum HSBC drawdown of -74.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHIN and HSBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHINHSBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.71%

-74.47%

+39.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.37%

-16.28%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.86%

-21.83%

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.59%

-0.63%

-12.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.87%

-23.98%

+12.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.63%

4.54%

+3.09%

Volatility

PHIN vs. HSBC - Volatility Comparison

PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) has a higher volatility of 15.50% compared to HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) at 7.09%. This indicates that PHIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHINHSBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.50%

7.09%

+8.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.38%

22.60%

+5.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.90%

26.99%

+5.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.93%

25.99%

+16.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.93%

25.42%

+17.51%

Dividends

PHIN vs. HSBC - Dividend Comparison

PHIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than HSBC's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSBC
HSBC Holdings plc
3.52%4.19%8.29%6.54%4.33%3.65%4.05%6.52%6.20%4.94%6.35%6.33%
PHIN
PHINIA Inc.
1.55%1.72%2.08%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PHIN vs. HSBC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PHINIA Inc. and HSBC Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

PHIN vs. HSBC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PHINIA Inc. and HSBC Holdings plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PHIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PHINIA Inc. reported a gross profit of 216.00M and revenue of 940.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.0%.

HSBC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 16.93B and revenue of 32.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.4%.

PHIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PHINIA Inc. reported an operating income of 88.00M and revenue of 940.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

HSBC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported an operating income of 9.36B and revenue of 32.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

PHIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PHINIA Inc. reported a net income of 40.00M and revenue of 940.00M, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.

HSBC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, HSBC Holdings plc reported a net income of 7.33B and revenue of 32.92B, resulting in a net margin of 22.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PHIN and HSBC have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHIN has higher volatility (15.50%) compared to HSBC (7.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHIN dropped -34.71% vs HSBC's -74.47%.

HSBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHIN and HSBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer