PHIN vs. VOOG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PHIN (PHINIA Inc.) is a stock, while VOOG (Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Over the past year, PHIN returned 88.86% vs 34.04% for VOOG. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PHIN vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHIN achieves a 28.21% return, which is significantly higher than VOOG's 13.78% return.

PHIN

• 1D: 1.95%
• 1M: 7.81%
• YTD: 28.21%
• 6M: 47.43%
• 1Y: 88.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VOOG

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 7.44%
• YTD: 13.78%
• 6M: 13.58%
• 1Y: 34.04%
• 3Y*: 28.13%
• 5Y*: 16.03%
• 10Y*: 18.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHIN vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PHIN PHINIA Inc.	28.21%	32.99%	62.69%	-16.59%
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF	13.78%	22.11%	35.89%	9.11%

Correlation

The correlation between PHIN and VOOG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023	0.30

Return for Risk

PHIN vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHIN

PHIN Risk / Return Rank: 92
PHIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
PHIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PHIN Omega Ratio Rank: 92
PHIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PHIN Martin Ratio Rank: 90

VOOG

VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 58
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 59
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHIN vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PHIN	VOOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.02	2.16	+0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	2.91	+0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.37	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.39	2.49	+1.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.28	10.32	+1.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PHIN vs. VOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHIN Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is higher than the VOOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHIN and VOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PHIN	VOOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.02	2.16	+0.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.91	-0.09

Drawdowns

PHIN vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHIN drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, which is greater than VOOG's maximum drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHIN and VOOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHIN	VOOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.71%	-32.73%	-1.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.37%	-13.71%	-6.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.73%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-1.08%	+0.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.23%	-4.97%	-7.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.27%	3.31%	+3.96%

Volatility

PHIN vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison

PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) has a higher volatility of 10.87% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) at 4.32%. This indicates that PHIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHIN	VOOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.87%	4.32%	+6.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.69%	12.41%	+10.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.58%	15.85%	+13.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.46%	21.19%	+19.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.46%	20.73%	+19.73%

Dividends

PHIN vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison

PHIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than VOOG's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PHIN PHINIA Inc.	1.05%	1.72%	2.08%	1.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF	0.44%	0.49%	0.49%	1.12%	0.93%	0.53%	0.88%	1.26%	1.34%	1.32%	1.47%	1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PHIN and VOOG in my portfolio?

PHIN and VOOG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PHIN or VOOG?

PHIN has higher volatility (10.87%) compared to VOOG (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHIN dropped -34.71% vs VOOG's -32.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PHIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.