PHIN vs. FBGRX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX).

FBGRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1987.

Performance

PHIN vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PHIN vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PHIN PHINIA Inc.	11.54%	32.99%	62.69%	-16.59%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	-7.12%	19.91%	39.77%	13.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHIN achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's -7.12% return.

PHIN

• 1D: 1.72%
• 1M: -3.74%
• YTD: 11.54%
• 6M: 22.48%
• 1Y: 65.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBGRX

• 1D: 4.54%
• 1M: -5.07%
• YTD: -7.12%
• 6M: -4.04%
• 1Y: 26.78%
• 3Y*: 26.54%
• 5Y*: 11.74%
• 10Y*: 19.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PHIN vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHIN

PHIN Risk / Return Rank: 87
PHIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PHIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PHIN Omega Ratio Rank: 86
PHIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
PHIN Martin Ratio Rank: 87

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHIN vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PHIN	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.13	+0.87
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	1.73	+0.78
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.25	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.31	2.00	+1.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.31	7.92	+1.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PHIN vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHIN Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHIN and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PHIN	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	1.13	+0.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.65	+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between PHIN and FBGRX is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PHIN vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

PHIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than FBGRX's 2.05% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PHIN PHINIA Inc.	1.59%	1.72%	2.08%	1.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	2.05%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%

Drawdowns

PHIN vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHIN drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHIN and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHIN	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.71%	-58.64%	+23.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.37%	-13.89%	-6.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.08%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.63%	-8.68%	-2.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.60%	-12.58%	-0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.25%	3.51%	+3.74%

Volatility

PHIN vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) has a higher volatility of 10.11% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 7.83%. This indicates that PHIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHIN	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.11%	7.83%	+2.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.25%	14.08%	+6.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.93%	24.98%	+7.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.72%	24.93%	+15.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.72%	23.63%	+17.09%