PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PHIN vs. FBGRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PHIN and FBGRX is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

PHIN vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
15.61%
11.18%
PHIN
FBGRX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PHIN:

1.95

FBGRX:

1.13

Sortino Ratio

PHIN:

2.82

FBGRX:

1.58

Omega Ratio

PHIN:

1.32

FBGRX:

1.21

Calmar Ratio

PHIN:

4.01

FBGRX:

1.57

Martin Ratio

PHIN:

9.10

FBGRX:

4.74

Ulcer Index

PHIN:

7.55%

FBGRX:

4.98%

Daily Std Dev

PHIN:

35.31%

FBGRX:

20.94%

Max Drawdown

PHIN:

-34.71%

FBGRX:

-55.96%

Current Drawdown

PHIN:

-12.13%

FBGRX:

-2.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHIN achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's 2.26% return.


PHIN

YTD

2.82%

1M

4.74%

6M

15.61%

1Y

61.83%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FBGRX

YTD

2.26%

1M

1.98%

6M

11.18%

1Y

22.53%

5Y*

14.52%

10Y*

13.28%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PHIN vs. FBGRX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHIN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PHIN is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PHIN is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PHIN is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PHIN is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PHIN is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PHIN is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBGRX is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PHIN vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PHIN, currently valued at 1.95, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.951.13
The chart of Sortino ratio for PHIN, currently valued at 2.82, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.821.58
The chart of Omega ratio for PHIN, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.321.21
The chart of Calmar ratio for PHIN, currently valued at 4.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.011.57
The chart of Martin ratio for PHIN, currently valued at 9.10, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.009.104.74
PHIN
FBGRX

The current PHIN Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHIN and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.95
1.13
PHIN
FBGRX

Dividends

PHIN vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

PHIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than FBGRX's 0.23% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PHIN
PHINIA Inc.
2.02%2.08%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
0.23%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.09%0.22%5.07%6.08%

Drawdowns

PHIN vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHIN drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -55.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHIN and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-12.13%
-2.53%
PHIN
FBGRX

Volatility

PHIN vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) has a higher volatility of 9.42% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 6.71%. This indicates that PHIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
9.42%
6.71%
PHIN
FBGRX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab