PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHIN vs. SCMWY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PHIN vs. SCMWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) and SwissCom AG (SCMWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHIN achieves a 18.34% return, which is significantly higher than SCMWY's 9.70% return.


PHIN

1D
0.73%
1M
-2.80%
6M
4.24%
YTD
18.34%
1Y
51.29%
3Y*
39.57%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
36.79%

SCMWY

1D
-1.56%
1M
0.26%
6M
-2.99%
YTD
9.70%
1Y
14.52%
3Y*
12.02%
5Y*
10.17%
10Y*
10.23%
ALL TIME*
9.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$30.52M$25.54M$30.06M
$1.06M$1.28M$1.14M

PHIN vs. SCMWY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PHIN
PHINIA Inc.
18.34%32.99%62.69%2.87%
SCMWY
SwissCom AG
9.70%35.49%1.05%-3.43%

Correlation

The correlation between PHIN and SCMWY is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023

0.04

The correlation between PHIN and SCMWY shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PHIN:

$2.72B

SCMWY:

$39.76B

EPS

PHIN:

$3.47

SCMWY:

CHF 2.40

PE Ratio

PHIN:

21.18

SCMWY:

25.80

PS Ratio

PHIN:

0.79

SCMWY:

2.15

PB Ratio

PHIN:

1.81

SCMWY:

2.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

PHIN:

$3.62B

SCMWY:

CHF 14.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PHIN:

$789.00M

SCMWY:

CHF 10.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

PHIN:

$440.00M

SCMWY:

CHF 5.60B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHIN vs. SCMWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PHIN
PHIN Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PHIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHIN Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PHIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHIN Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SCMWY
SCMWY Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SCMWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCMWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCMWY Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SCMWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCMWY Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PHIN vs. SCMWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) and SwissCom AG (SCMWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHINSCMWYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.14

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

0.89

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.28

2.33

+3.95

PHIN vs. SCMWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHIN Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the SCMWY Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHIN and SCMWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PHIN vs. SCMWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHIN drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, roughly equal to the maximum SCMWY drawdown of -33.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHIN and SCMWY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHINSCMWYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.71%

-33.75%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.37%

-16.49%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.86%

-16.68%

-16.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.59%

-14.76%

+1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.87%

-8.55%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.63%

6.31%

+1.32%

Volatility

PHIN vs. SCMWY - Volatility Comparison

PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) has a higher volatility of 15.50% compared to SwissCom AG (SCMWY) at 4.81%. This indicates that PHIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCMWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHINSCMWYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.50%

4.81%

+10.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.38%

13.42%

+14.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.90%

19.02%

+13.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.93%

17.65%

+25.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.93%

17.26%

+25.67%

Dividends

PHIN vs. SCMWY - Dividend Comparison

PHIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than SCMWY's 4.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHIN
PHINIA Inc.
1.55%1.72%2.08%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCMWY
SwissCom AG
4.40%3.44%8.77%3.99%4.30%4.38%4.28%4.13%4.91%8.30%9.75%4.60%

Financials

PHIN vs. SCMWY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PHINIA Inc. and SwissCom AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

PHIN vs. SCMWY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PHINIA Inc. and SwissCom AG over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PHIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PHINIA Inc. reported a gross profit of 216.00M and revenue of 940.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.0%.

SCMWY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SwissCom AG reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 3.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.0%.

PHIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PHINIA Inc. reported an operating income of 88.00M and revenue of 940.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

SCMWY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SwissCom AG reported an operating income of 618.49M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.

PHIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PHINIA Inc. reported a net income of 40.00M and revenue of 940.00M, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.

SCMWY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SwissCom AG reported a net income of 339.41M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PHIN and SCMWY have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHIN has higher volatility (15.50%) compared to SCMWY (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHIN dropped -34.71% vs SCMWY's -33.75%.

PHIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHIN and SCMWY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer