PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCMWY vs. GZPZY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SCMWY vs. GZPZY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SwissCom AG (SCMWY) and Gaztransport & Technigaz SA (GZPZY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCMWY achieves a 19.14% return, which is significantly lower than GZPZY's 22.29% return.


SCMWY

1D
-1.28%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
19.14%
6M
23.49%
1Y
25.82%
3Y*
16.06%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
11.10%

GZPZY

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.84%
YTD
22.29%
6M
16.94%
1Y
22.66%
3Y*
41.89%
5Y*
25.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCMWY vs. GZPZY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SCMWY
SwissCom AG
19.14%35.49%1.05%13.81%1.30%9.86%0.05%
GZPZY
Gaztransport & Technigaz SA
22.29%48.62%-0.28%35.16%16.13%-0.66%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SCMWY and GZPZY is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020

0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SCMWY:

$43.18B

GZPZY:

$8.49B

EPS

SCMWY:

$2.40

GZPZY:

$4.09

PE Ratio

SCMWY:

34.73

GZPZY:

11.18

PS Ratio

SCMWY:

2.89

GZPZY:

5.89

PB Ratio

SCMWY:

3.88

GZPZY:

14.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

SCMWY:

$14.92B

GZPZY:

$1.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SCMWY:

$10.10B

GZPZY:

$1.26B

EBITDA (TTM)

SCMWY:

$5.60B

GZPZY:

$868.11M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCMWY vs. GZPZY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCMWY
SCMWY Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SCMWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCMWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCMWY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCMWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCMWY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

GZPZY
GZPZY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GZPZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GZPZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GZPZY Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GZPZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
GZPZY Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCMWY vs. GZPZY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SwissCom AG (SCMWY) and Gaztransport & Technigaz SA (GZPZY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCMWYGZPZYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

0.89

+0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.11

1.61

+0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.48

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

2.59

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.23

5.20

+2.03

SCMWY vs. GZPZY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCMWY Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the GZPZY Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCMWY and GZPZY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCMWYGZPZYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

0.89

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.88

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.73

-0.23

Drawdowns

SCMWY vs. GZPZY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCMWY drawdown since its inception was -33.75%, roughly equal to the maximum GZPZY drawdown of -32.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMWY and GZPZY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCMWYGZPZYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.75%

-32.48%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.34%

-8.82%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.68%

-15.31%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

-32.48%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.43%

-6.70%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.52%

-9.01%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

4.38%

-0.80%

Volatility

SCMWY vs. GZPZY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SwissCom AG (SCMWY) is 4.65%, while Gaztransport & Technigaz SA (GZPZY) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that SCMWY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GZPZY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCMWYGZPZYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

7.68%

-3.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.89%

20.39%

-6.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.56%

26.71%

-8.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

29.39%

-11.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

28.90%

-11.54%

Dividends

SCMWY vs. GZPZY - Dividend Comparison

SCMWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than GZPZY's 3.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GZPZY
Gaztransport & Technigaz SA
3.95%4.83%4.97%2.66%2.26%3.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCMWY
SwissCom AG
4.05%3.44%8.77%3.99%4.30%4.38%4.28%4.13%4.91%8.30%9.75%4.60%

Financials

SCMWY vs. GZPZY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SwissCom AG and Gaztransport & Technigaz SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
3.69B
411.24M
(SCMWY) Total Revenue
(GZPZY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SCMWY vs. GZPZY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SwissCom AG and Gaztransport & Technigaz SA over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
28.0%
65.0%
Portfolio components
SCMWY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SwissCom AG reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 3.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.0%.

GZPZY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gaztransport & Technigaz SA reported a gross profit of 267.30M and revenue of 411.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.0%.

SCMWY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SwissCom AG reported an operating income of 618.49M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.

GZPZY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gaztransport & Technigaz SA reported an operating income of 269.14M and revenue of 411.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 65.5%.

SCMWY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SwissCom AG reported a net income of 339.41M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.

GZPZY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gaztransport & Technigaz SA reported a net income of 231.91M and revenue of 411.24M, resulting in a net margin of 56.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SCMWY and GZPZY have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GZPZY has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to SCMWY (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCMWY dropped -33.75% vs GZPZY's -32.48%.

SCMWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCMWY and GZPZY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer