PGROX vs. DRGVX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund (PGROX) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX).
PGROX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Jul 14, 1993. DRGVX is an actively managed fund by BNY Mellon. It was launched on May 31, 2001.
Performance
PGROX vs. DRGVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PGROX vs. DRGVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGROX BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund | -6.54% | 13.46% | 7.88% | 22.40% | -17.75% | 23.85% | 24.43% | 34.92% | -8.66% | 27.05% |
DRGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I | 2.32% | 18.48% | 14.26% | 12.83% | 1.51% | 31.14% | 3.94% | 27.04% | -10.52% | 15.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGROX achieves a -6.54% return, which is significantly lower than DRGVX's 2.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PGROX has underperformed DRGVX with an annualized return of 11.17%, while DRGVX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.96% annualized return.
PGROX
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- -6.54%
- 6M
- -5.12%
- 1Y
- 9.20%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
DRGVX
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- 18.32%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 12.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PGROX vs. DRGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGROX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGVX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PGROX vs. DRGVX — Risk / Return Rank
PGROX
DRGVX
PGROX vs. DRGVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund (PGROX) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGROX | DRGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 1.07 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | 1.54 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.23 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 1.56 | -0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.20 | 6.92 | -3.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGROX | DRGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 1.07 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.81 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.69 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.61 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between PGROX and DRGVX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PGROX vs. DRGVX - Dividend Comparison
PGROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.96%, more than DRGVX's 6.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGROX BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund | 18.96% | 17.72% | 11.89% | 1.88% | 7.61% | 8.12% | 4.05% | 7.44% | 13.96% | 13.45% | 8.19% | 8.46% |
DRGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I | 6.72% | 6.88% | 6.87% | 5.31% | 7.99% | 21.73% | 2.85% | 3.52% | 17.87% | 10.95% | 2.89% | 16.07% |
Drawdowns
PGROX vs. DRGVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGROX drawdown since its inception was -47.75%, which is greater than DRGVX's maximum drawdown of -42.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGROX and DRGVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGROX | DRGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.75% | -42.60% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.70% | -12.22% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.99% | -17.01% | -9.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.17% | -42.60% | +12.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.79% | -4.62% | -4.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.50% | -4.39% | -4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 2.76% | +0.36% |
Volatility
PGROX vs. DRGVX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund (PGROX) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) at 4.71%. This indicates that PGROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRGVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PGROX | DRGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 4.71% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.69% | 9.13% | +0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.58% | 16.88% | +0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 15.60% | +2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 18.82% | -0.90% |