DRGVX vs. AMBFX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DRGVX (BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I) and AMBFX (American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2) are both mutual funds - DRGVX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while AMBFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by American Funds. Over the past 10 years, DRGVX returned 14.35%/yr vs 10.56%/yr for AMBFX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DRGVX charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for AMBFX.

Performance

DRGVX vs. AMBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2 (AMBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRGVX achieves a 15.75% return, which is significantly higher than AMBFX's 9.50% return. Over the past 10 years, DRGVX has outperformed AMBFX with an annualized return of 14.35%, while AMBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.56% annualized return.

DRGVX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 2.59%
• YTD: 15.75%
• 6M: 14.70%
• 1Y: 29.67%
• 3Y*: 20.11%
• 5Y*: 14.34%
• 10Y*: 14.35%

AMBFX

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 1.44%
• YTD: 9.50%
• 6M: 9.41%
• 1Y: 22.97%
• 3Y*: 17.35%
• 5Y*: 9.88%
• 10Y*: 10.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRGVX vs. AMBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DRGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I	15.75%	18.48%	14.26%	12.83%	1.51%	31.14%	3.94%	27.04%	-10.52%	15.06%
AMBFX American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2	9.50%	18.67%	15.25%	13.81%	-11.93%	16.00%	11.06%	19.45%	-2.69%	14.85%

Correlation

The correlation between DRGVX and AMBFX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.85

The correlation between DRGVX and AMBFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DRGVX vs. AMBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRGVX

DRGVX Risk / Return Rank: 83
DRGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
DRGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
DRGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
DRGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
DRGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

AMBFX

AMBFX Risk / Return Rank: 83
AMBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
AMBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AMBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
AMBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
AMBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRGVX vs. AMBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2 (AMBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRGVX	AMBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	2.59	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.43	3.60	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.49	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.59	3.40	+1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.80	15.09	+1.71

DRGVX vs. AMBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRGVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the AMBFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRGVX and AMBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DRGVX vs. AMBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRGVX drawdown since its inception was -42.60%, which is greater than AMBFX's maximum drawdown of -35.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRGVX and AMBFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRGVX	AMBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.60%	-35.05%	-7.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.65%	-7.00%	+0.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.01%	-10.64%	-6.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.01%	-18.65%	+1.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.60%	-22.31%	-20.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	-0.51%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.32%	-3.58%	-0.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	1.57%	+0.25%

Volatility

DRGVX vs. AMBFX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2 (AMBFX) at 3.39%. This indicates that DRGVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRGVX	AMBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.25%	3.39%	+0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.57%	7.31%	+2.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.34%	9.22%	+3.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.60%	10.57%	+5.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.85%	10.72%	+8.13%

DRGVX vs. AMBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRGVX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than AMBFX's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRGVX vs. AMBFX - Dividend Comparison

DRGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%, less than AMBFX's 7.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMBFX American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2	7.31%	8.47%	7.40%	2.20%	2.52%	4.50%	4.56%	4.19%	6.20%	4.85%	4.46%	5.81%
DRGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I	5.94%	6.88%	6.87%	5.31%	7.99%	21.73%	2.85%	3.52%	17.87%	10.95%	2.89%	16.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRGVX and AMBFX in my portfolio?

DRGVX and AMBFX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DRGVX or AMBFX?

DRGVX has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to AMBFX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRGVX dropped -42.60% vs AMBFX's -35.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.