DRGVX vs. ACAZX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) and Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (ACAZX).
DRGVX is an actively managed fund by BNY Mellon. It was launched on May 31, 2001. ACAZX is managed by Alger. It was launched on Dec 29, 2010.
Performance
DRGVX vs. ACAZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DRGVX vs. ACAZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I | 0.14% | 18.48% | 14.26% | 12.83% | 1.51% | 31.14% | 3.94% | 27.04% | -10.52% | 15.06% |
ACAZX Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z | -14.55% | 31.33% | 69.38% | 43.53% | -36.63% | 18.48% | 42.23% | 33.63% | -0.61% | 31.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRGVX achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly higher than ACAZX's -14.55% return. Over the past 10 years, DRGVX has underperformed ACAZX with an annualized return of 12.72%, while ACAZX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.05% annualized return.
DRGVX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 5.03%
- 1Y
- 15.53%
- 3Y*
- 15.03%
- 5Y*
- 12.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
ACAZX
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -9.35%
- YTD
- -14.55%
- 6M
- -15.47%
- 1Y
- 27.56%
- 3Y*
- 33.90%
- 5Y*
- 15.17%
- 10Y*
- 18.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DRGVX vs. ACAZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRGVX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than ACAZX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DRGVX vs. ACAZX — Risk / Return Rank
DRGVX
ACAZX
DRGVX vs. ACAZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) and Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (ACAZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRGVX | ACAZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 0.98 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 1.52 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.20 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 1.25 | -0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.39 | 4.15 | +1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRGVX | ACAZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 0.98 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.53 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.72 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.68 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between DRGVX and ACAZX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DRGVX vs. ACAZX - Dividend Comparison
DRGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.87%, less than ACAZX's 10.33% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I | 6.87% | 6.88% | 6.87% | 5.31% | 7.99% | 21.73% | 2.85% | 3.52% | 17.87% | 10.95% | 2.89% | 16.07% |
ACAZX Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z | 10.33% | 8.83% | 23.61% | 6.65% | 4.13% | 22.24% | 14.91% | 7.87% | 11.23% | 6.60% | 0.82% | 8.15% |
Drawdowns
DRGVX vs. ACAZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRGVX drawdown since its inception was -42.60%, smaller than the maximum ACAZX drawdown of -47.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRGVX and ACAZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRGVX | ACAZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.60% | -47.92% | +5.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.22% | -18.97% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.01% | -47.92% | +30.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.60% | -47.92% | +5.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.65% | -18.97% | +12.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.39% | -8.40% | +4.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 5.73% | -2.99% |
Volatility
DRGVX vs. ACAZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) is 4.03%, while Alger Capital Appreciation Fund Class Z (ACAZX) has a volatility of 7.44%. This indicates that DRGVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACAZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DRGVX | ACAZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 7.44% | -3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.88% | 16.29% | -7.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 27.45% | -10.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 28.88% | -13.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.81% | 25.31% | -6.50% |