PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGROX vs. ANWPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGROX vs. ANWPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund (PGROX) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGROX achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly lower than ANWPX's 7.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PGROX has underperformed ANWPX with an annualized return of 12.22%, while ANWPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.46% annualized return.


PGROX

1D
0.09%
1M
2.37%
YTD
4.33%
6M
4.49%
1Y
14.75%
3Y*
11.47%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*
12.22%

ANWPX

1D
0.07%
1M
4.89%
YTD
7.27%
6M
8.88%
1Y
20.42%
3Y*
18.59%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
13.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGROX vs. ANWPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGROX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund
4.33%13.46%7.88%22.40%-17.75%23.85%24.43%34.92%-8.66%27.05%
ANWPX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A
7.27%21.33%16.76%24.63%-25.92%17.64%33.42%30.10%-5.99%28.91%

Correlation

The correlation between PGROX and ANWPX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 1993

0.89

The correlation between PGROX and ANWPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGROX vs. ANWPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGROX
PGROX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PGROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGROX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PGROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGROX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

ANWPX
ANWPX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ANWPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANWPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANWPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ANWPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANWPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGROX vs. ANWPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund (PGROX) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGROXANWPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

1.60

-0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

2.29

-0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.29

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

1.85

-0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.06

7.80

-2.74

PGROX vs. ANWPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGROX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the ANWPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGROX and ANWPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGROXANWPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.60

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.51

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.76

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.67

-0.11

Drawdowns

PGROX vs. ANWPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGROX drawdown since its inception was -47.75%, smaller than the maximum ANWPX drawdown of -52.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGROX and ANWPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGROXANWPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.75%

-52.34%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.70%

-11.48%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.81%

-17.93%

-5.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.99%

-34.45%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.17%

-34.45%

+4.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

-8.11%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

2.72%

+0.25%

Volatility

PGROX vs. ANWPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund (PGROX) is 3.13%, while American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that PGROX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANWPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGROXANWPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

3.93%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

10.80%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.45%

13.42%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.71%

17.21%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

17.83%

+0.13%

PGROX vs. ANWPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGROX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than ANWPX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGROX vs. ANWPX - Dividend Comparison

PGROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.01%, more than ANWPX's 6.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANWPX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A
6.13%6.57%5.13%5.36%4.16%7.01%4.13%3.67%7.59%5.50%3.86%6.14%
PGROX
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund
17.01%17.72%11.89%1.88%7.61%8.12%4.05%7.44%13.96%13.45%8.19%8.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, PGROX and ANWPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ANWPX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to PGROX (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGROX dropped -47.75% vs ANWPX's -52.34%.

ANWPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGROX and ANWPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer