PGRO vs. BBUS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

PGRO (Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. PGRO is actively managed, while BBUS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PGRO returned 14.70%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for BBUS. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PGRO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.

Performance

PGRO vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PGRO having a 10.18% return and BBUS slightly higher at 10.60%.

PGRO

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 7.11%
• YTD: 10.18%
• 6M: 9.15%
• 1Y: 27.37%
• 3Y*: 25.15%
• 5Y*: 14.70%
• 10Y*: —

BBUS

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 5.12%
• YTD: 10.60%
• 6M: 10.47%
• 1Y: 27.47%
• 3Y*: 22.46%
• 5Y*: 13.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGRO vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PGRO Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF	10.18%	15.13%	34.01%	45.19%	-31.53%	16.67%
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF	10.60%	17.77%	24.89%	27.20%	-19.46%	13.62%

Correlation

The correlation between PGRO and BBUS is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021	0.93

The correlation between PGRO and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

PGRO vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PGRO	BBUS
Technology	49.5%	37.1%
Communication Services	14.3%	10.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.4%	9.4%
Industrials	7.1%	7.2%
Healthcare	7.1%	8.1%
Financial Services	5.4%	10.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	4.5%
Basic Materials	2.5%	1.2%
Utilities	1.1%	2.6%
Real Estate	0.9%	1.7%
Energy	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

PGRO vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGRO

PGRO Risk / Return Rank: 43
PGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
PGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 47
PGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
PGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 36

BBUS

BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 68
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGRO vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PGRO	BBUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	2.33	-0.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	3.18	-0.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.42	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	3.00	-1.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.66	13.76	-8.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PGRO vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGRO and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PGRO	BBUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.71	2.33	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.79	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.84	-0.17

Drawdowns

PGRO vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGRO drawdown since its inception was -34.73%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGRO and BBUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	PGRO	BBUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.73%	-35.35%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.34%	-9.21%	-7.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.31%	-19.01%	-4.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.73%	-25.46%	-9.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.74%	+0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.28%	-5.46%	-4.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.95%	2.00%	+2.95%

Volatility

PGRO vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that PGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PGRO	BBUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	2.88%	+0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.25%	8.96%	+3.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.07%	11.87%	+4.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.81%	17.03%	+4.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.77%	19.59%	+2.18%

PGRO vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGRO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

PGRO vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

PGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF	0.98%	1.07%	1.21%	1.38%	1.57%	1.11%	1.43%	1.37%
PGRO Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF	0.02%	0.02%	0.08%	0.19%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PGRO and BBUS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, PGRO and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PGRO or BBUS?

PGRO has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGRO dropped -34.73% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

Which ETF is better, PGRO or BBUS?

On 5-year performance, PGRO leads with 14.70% vs 13.43% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PGRO or BBUS?

Over the 5-year period, PGRO has performed better with a 14.70% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PGRO or BBUS?

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PGRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PGRO or BBUS?

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.02% for PGRO.

What is the main difference between PGRO and BBUS?

They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PGRO and 0.02% for BBUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.