PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGR vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PGR vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Progressive Corporation (PGR) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGR achieves a 5.28% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 7.53% return. Over the past 10 years, PGR has outperformed COST with an annualized return of 24.49%, while COST has yielded a comparatively lower 21.51% annualized return.


PGR

1D
3.14%
1M
16.94%
YTD
5.28%
6M
5.28%
1Y
-9.22%
3Y*
23.04%
5Y*
20.55%
10Y*
24.49%

COST

1D
-1.15%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
7.53%
6M
7.53%
1Y
-5.69%
3Y*
21.37%
5Y*
19.59%
10Y*
21.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGR vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGR
The Progressive Corporation
5.28%-3.02%51.39%23.16%26.81%10.84%41.48%25.14%9.39%61.59%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
7.53%-5.39%39.62%49.00%-19.05%51.82%32.67%45.70%10.60%22.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PGR and COST is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 1993

0.30

Fundamentals

EPS

PGR:

$19.67

COST:

$26.51

PE Ratio

PGR:

11.46

COST:

34.89

PEG Ratio

PGR:

0.09

COST:

2.73

PS Ratio

PGR:

1.48

COST:

1.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

PGR:

$89.43B

COST:

$293.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PGR:

$25.44B

COST:

$11.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

PGR:

$15.15B

COST:

$12.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGR vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGR
PGR Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGR Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGR Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGR vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Progressive Corporation (PGR) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGRCOSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.97

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

-0.37

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.64

-0.84

+0.20

PGR vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGR Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGR and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGR vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGR drawdown since its inception was -71.06%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGR and COST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGRCOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.06%

-53.39%

-17.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.54%

-15.50%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.35%

-20.74%

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.35%

-31.40%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.35%

-31.40%

+1.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.58%

-15.50%

-2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.54%

-13.36%

-1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.09%

6.77%

+8.32%

Volatility

PGR vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

The Progressive Corporation (PGR) has a higher volatility of 9.25% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.86%. This indicates that PGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGRCOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.25%

4.86%

+4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.76%

14.62%

+3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.42%

18.91%

+4.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.75%

22.77%

+1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.55%

21.98%

+2.57%

Dividends

PGR vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

PGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, more than COST's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.58%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%
PGR
The Progressive Corporation
6.17%2.15%0.48%0.25%0.31%6.23%2.68%3.89%1.86%1.21%2.50%2.16%

Financials

PGR vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Progressive Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B40.00B60.00B80.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
22.18B
70.53B
(PGR) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PGR vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Progressive Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-30.0%-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
37.7%
-25.1%
Portfolio components
PGR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported a gross profit of 8.35B and revenue of 22.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.

PGR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported an operating income of 3.57B and revenue of 22.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

PGR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported a net income of 2.82B and revenue of 22.18B, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PGR and COST have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGR has higher volatility (9.25%) compared to COST (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGR dropped -71.06% vs COST's -53.39%.

COST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.30 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGR and COST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer