PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGR vs. AMAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PGR vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Progressive Corporation (PGR) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGR achieves a -6.42% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's 91.99% return. Over the past 10 years, PGR has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 23.25%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 36.71% annualized return.


PGR

1D
-1.84%
1M
3.23%
YTD
-6.42%
6M
-4.51%
1Y
-23.65%
3Y*
18.74%
5Y*
18.76%
10Y*
23.25%

AMAT

1D
8.64%
1M
13.17%
YTD
91.99%
6M
83.99%
1Y
197.34%
3Y*
54.75%
5Y*
30.69%
10Y*
36.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGR vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGR
The Progressive Corporation
-6.42%-3.02%51.39%23.16%26.81%10.84%41.48%25.14%9.39%61.59%
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
91.99%59.60%1.13%67.97%-37.54%83.64%43.29%89.86%-34.92%59.86%

Correlation

The correlation between PGR and AMAT is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 1986

0.22

The correlation between PGR and AMAT shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

PGR:

$19.23

AMAT:

$10.61

PE Ratio

PGR:

10.41

AMAT:

46.38

PEG Ratio

PGR:

0.08

AMAT:

5.90

PS Ratio

PGR:

1.34

AMAT:

13.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

PGR:

$87.65B

AMAT:

$29.02B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PGR:

$23.23B

AMAT:

$14.21B

EBITDA (TTM)

PGR:

$14.81B

AMAT:

$9.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGR vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGR
PGR Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGR Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

AMAT
AMAT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGR vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Progressive Corporation (PGR) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PGRAMATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.55

-0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

9.29

-10.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.43

26.48

-27.91

PGR vs. AMAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGR Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the AMAT Sharpe Ratio of 4.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGR and AMAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PGRAMATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.04

4.15

-5.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.70

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.86

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.43

+0.15

Drawdowns

PGR vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGR drawdown since its inception was -71.06%, smaller than the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGR and AMAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGRAMATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.06%

-85.22%

+14.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.27%

-21.37%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.35%

-49.88%

+19.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.35%

-55.14%

+24.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.35%

-55.14%

+24.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.74%

-1.90%

-24.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-38.80%

+24.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.79%

7.49%

+11.30%

Volatility

PGR vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Progressive Corporation (PGR) is 7.57%, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a volatility of 19.01%. This indicates that PGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGRAMATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.57%

19.01%

-11.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.95%

37.52%

-20.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.76%

47.94%

-25.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.55%

43.93%

-19.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.48%

42.81%

-18.33%

Dividends

PGR vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison

PGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than AMAT's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
0.39%0.69%0.93%0.75%1.05%0.60%1.01%1.36%2.14%0.78%1.24%2.14%
PGR
The Progressive Corporation
6.94%2.15%0.48%0.25%0.31%6.23%2.68%3.89%1.86%1.21%2.50%2.16%

Financials

PGR vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Progressive Corporation and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
22.74B
7.91B
(PGR) Total Revenue
(AMAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PGR vs. AMAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Progressive Corporation and Applied Materials, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
29.3%
49.9%
Portfolio components
PGR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported a gross profit of 6.66B and revenue of 22.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.3%.

AMAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.95B and revenue of 7.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.9%.

PGR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported an operating income of 3.68B and revenue of 22.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.

AMAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.52B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.9%.

PGR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Progressive Corporation reported a net income of 2.95B and revenue of 22.74B, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.

AMAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 2.81B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in a net margin of 35.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PGR and AMAT have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMAT has higher volatility (19.01%) compared to PGR (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGR dropped -71.06% vs AMAT's -85.22%.

AMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.15 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGR and AMAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer