PGNAX vs. RSNRX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) and Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX).
PGNAX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 21, 1990. RSNRX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Nov 14, 1995.
Performance
PGNAX vs. RSNRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PGNAX vs. RSNRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGNAX PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund | 18.84% | 38.58% | 0.80% | -2.22% | 24.40% | 27.22% | 11.22% | 16.50% | -27.87% | 4.99% |
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund | 16.87% | 69.60% | 15.94% | -8.64% | 35.02% | 83.01% | 27.35% | -24.49% | -45.81% | 1.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGNAX achieves a 18.84% return, which is significantly higher than RSNRX's 16.87% return. Over the past 10 years, PGNAX has underperformed RSNRX with an annualized return of 12.39%, while RSNRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.96% annualized return.
PGNAX
- 1D
- 2.81%
- 1M
- -5.30%
- YTD
- 18.84%
- 6M
- 29.40%
- 1Y
- 61.24%
- 3Y*
- 19.40%
- 5Y*
- 17.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
RSNRX
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 31.78%
- 1Y
- 107.01%
- 3Y*
- 27.41%
- 5Y*
- 30.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PGNAX vs. RSNRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGNAX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than RSNRX's 1.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PGNAX vs. RSNRX — Risk / Return Rank
PGNAX
RSNRX
PGNAX vs. RSNRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) and Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGNAX | RSNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.53 | 4.08 | -1.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.96 | 4.47 | -1.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.66 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 7.33 | -3.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.74 | 27.20 | -9.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGNAX | RSNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 4.08 | -1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 1.19 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.44 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.29 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between PGNAX and RSNRX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PGNAX vs. RSNRX - Dividend Comparison
PGNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than RSNRX's 3.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGNAX PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund | 0.81% | 0.96% | 0.98% | 1.93% | 2.75% | 0.84% | 1.32% | 1.78% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 1.15% |
RSNRX Victory Global Energy Transition Fund | 3.75% | 4.38% | 1.65% | 2.36% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PGNAX vs. RSNRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGNAX drawdown since its inception was -76.46%, smaller than the maximum RSNRX drawdown of -89.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGNAX and RSNRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGNAX | RSNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.46% | -89.73% | +13.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.76% | -14.36% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.24% | -25.44% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.86% | -84.27% | +20.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.30% | -0.65% | -4.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.31% | -26.07% | +5.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 3.87% | -0.33% |
Volatility
PGNAX vs. RSNRX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Fund (PGNAX) has a higher volatility of 8.49% compared to Victory Global Energy Transition Fund (RSNRX) at 6.66%. This indicates that PGNAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSNRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PGNAX | RSNRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.49% | 6.66% | +1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.50% | 19.24% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.97% | 26.79% | -1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.49% | 25.47% | +0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.55% | 31.80% | -5.25% |